And how many hearings are there in Congress about the destruction of free  
speech
in academia ?  None. The same number as the number of hearings to  determine
the competence of the APA in its decades long support of homosexual  causes
and its concomitant brainwashing of the American public into acceptance  of
the ludicrous proposition that homosexuality is "normal."
 
Hey, who has been in charge of the House, and sometimes the Senate,
since 1996?  Translation :  To believe that the  Republicans are competent
is just about  as ridiculous as thinking that the democrats are sane  or 
moral.
 
The whole damn system needs to be thrown out.
 
My humble opinion
 
Billy
 
 
===================================
 
WSJ
published at
Real Clear Politics
 
 
Bonfire of the Humanities
Christine Lagarde is the latest ritualistic burning of a  
college-commencement heretic. 

 
 
May 14, 2014 7:19 p.m. ET
It's been a long time coming, but America's colleges  and universities have 
finally descended into lunacy.  
Last month, Brandeis University banned Somali-born  feminist Ayaan Hirsi 
Ali as its commencement speaker, purporting that "Ms. Hirsi  Ali's record of 
anti-Islam statements" violates Brandeis's "core values."  
This week higher education's ritualistic burning of  college-commencement 
heretics spread to Smith College and Haverford College.  
On Monday, Smith announced the withdrawal of _Christine Lagarde_ 
(http://topics.wsj.com/person/L/Christine-Lagarde/6594) , the French head of 
the 
International  Monetary Fund. And what might the problem be with Madame 
Lagarde, 
considered one  of the world's most accomplished women? An online petition 
signed by some 480  offended Smithies said the IMF is associated with 
"imperialistic and patriarchal  systems that oppress and abuse women 
worldwide." 
With unmistakable French irony,  Ms. Lagarde withdrew "to preserve the 
celebratory spirit" of Smith's  commencement.  
On Tuesday, Haverford College's graduating  intellectuals forced 
commencement speaker Robert J. Birgeneau to withdraw. Get  this: Mr. Birgeneau 
is the 
former chancellor of UC Berkeley, the big bang of  political correctness. It 
gets better.
 
Berkeley's Mr. Birgeneau is famous as an ardent  defender of minority 
students, the LGBT community and undocumented illegal  immigrants. What could 
possibly be wrong with this guy speaking at  Haverford??? Haverfordians were 
upset that in 2011 the Berkeley police used  "force" against Occupy protesters 
in Sproul Plaza. They said Mr. Birgeneau could  speak at Haverford if he 
agreed to nine conditions, including his support for  reparations for the 
victims of Berkeley's violence.  
In a letter, Mr. Birgeneau replied, "As a longtime  civil rights activist 
and firm supporter of nonviolence, I do not respond to  untruthful, violent 
verbal attacks."  
Smith president Kathleen McCartney felt obliged to  assert that she is 
"committed to leading a college where differing views can be  heard and debated 
with respect." And Haverford's president, Daniel Weiss, wrote  to the 
students that their demands "read more like a jury issuing a verdict than  as 
an 
invitation to a discussion or a request for shared learning." 
Mr. Birgeneau, Ms. McCartney, Mr. Weiss and indeed  many others in American 
academe must wonder what is happening to their world  this chilled spring. 
Here's the short explanation: You're all  conservatives now.  
Years ago, when the academic left began to ostracize  professors identified 
as "conservative," university administrators stood aside  or were 
complicit. The academic left adopted a notion espoused back then by a  "New 
Left" 
German philosopher—who taught at Brandeis, not coincidentally—that  many 
conservative ideas were immoral and deserved to be suppressed. And so they  
were. 
 
This shunning and isolation of "conservative"  teachers by their left-wing 
colleagues (with many liberals silent in  acquiescence) weakened the 
foundational ideas of American universities—freedom  of inquiry and the speech 
rights in the First Amendment. 
No matter. University presidents, deans, department  heads and boards of 
trustees watched or approved the erosion of their original  intellectual 
framework. The ability of aggrieved professors and their students  to concoct 
behavior, ideas and words that violated political correctness got so  loopy 
that the phrase itself became satirical—though not so funny to profs  denied 
tenure on suspicion of incorrectness. Offensive books were banned and  history 
texts rewritten to conform. 
No one could possibly count the compromises of  intellectual honesty made 
on American campuses to reach this point. It is  fantastic that the liberal 
former head of Berkeley should have to sign a Maoist  self-criticism to be 
able to speak at Haverford. Meet America's Red Guards. 
These students at Brandeis, Smith, Haverford and  hundreds of other U.S. 
colleges didn't discover illiberal intolerance on their  own. It is fed to 
them three times a week by professors of mental conformity.  After Brandeis 
banned Ms. Hirsi Ali, the Harvard Crimson's editors wrote a  rationalizing 
editorial, "A Rightful Revocation." The legendary liberal Louis  Brandeis 
(Harvard Law, First Amendment icon) must be spinning in his grave.  
Years ago, today's middle-aged liberals embraced in  good faith ideas such 
as that the Western canon in literature or history should  be expanded to 
include Africa, Asia, Native Americans and such. Fair enough. The  activist 
academic left then grabbed the liberals' good faith and wrecked it,  allowing 
the nuttiest professors to dumb down courses and even whole disciplines  
into tendentious gibberish.  
The slow disintegration of the humanities into what  is virtually agitprop 
on many campuses is no secret. Professors of economics and  the hard 
sciences roll their eyes in embarrassment at what has happened to once  
respectable 
liberal-arts departments at their institutions. Like some Gresham's  Law 
for Ph.D.s, the bad professors drove out many good, untenured professors,  and 
that includes smart young liberals. Most conservatives were wiped out long  
ago.  
One might conclude: Who cares? Parents are beginning  to see that this is a 
$65,000-a-year scam that won't get their kids a job in an  economy that 
wants quantification skills. Parents and students increasingly will  flee the 
politicized nut-houses for apolitical MOOCs—massive open online  courses.  
Still, it's a tragedy. The loonies are becoming the  public face of some 
once-revered repositories of the humanities. Sic transit  whatever.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to