from the site:
Science 2.0
 
 
 
 
Science Left Behind  2014: 
The Anti-Vaccination  Update

By Hank Campbell
 
 
_Science Left Behind_ 
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1610391640/ref=as_li_tf_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=funnierthanyo-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&cre
ativeASIN=1610391640) , a book I co-authored in 2012 with Dr.  Alex Berez
ow, covered the ways that anti-science beliefs had become mainstream  among 
political progressives in the United States. 

It addressed  dozens of topics but the three biggest ones denied by 
progressives (along with a  few fellow liberals and Democrats) were the 
findings 
that anti-vaccine,  anti-biology and anti-energy science positions were 
overwhelmingly  left.

Political operatives in the business of promoting the idea that  science 
registers as Democrat disputed that, insisting that anti-vaccine beliefs  were 
'bipartisan', and they even made a big deal of it when a Republican finally 
 ranted about vaccines and the CDC, but most scientists saw through their 
ruse  and began to criticize anti-science opponents on the left with the same 
zeal  they had when it was being done by the right. That makes sense - 
scientists know  advocacy groups like Union of Concerned Scientists and 
Greenpeace don't really  accept science when they say they believe it about 
climate 
change but deny it  about everything else.


And so, scientists in academia have defended their brethren in the private  
sector and fought back against claims by the left that vaccines are just a  
corporate scam, and that genetically-modified foods are abominations of 
nature.  The tide has clearly turned since 2012, to such an extent that _the 
New York Times is ridiculing California progressive  elites putting their 
children at risk_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/nyregion/fear-of-vaccines-goes-viral.html?source=science20.com)
  by denying them  vaccines.

New York is a solid blue state but even the liberal-est of New  York City 
liberals don't try to make it possible to overturn law and medical  science 
and allow a philosophical exemption from vaccines 'on demand' the way  
California progressives do.

Not everyone understands the distinction  between the progressives 
criticized in Science Left Behind and liberals  and Democrats overall. San 
Francisco 
_science blogger Steve Silberman_ (http://t.co/mlbRIb6EaZ)  objected to the 
New York  Times claim that more left-wing people are anti-vaccine at all:



"Just as much"? Well, no, it's not even close.

He's a fine thinker,  I agree with him probably 90 percent of the time, and 
I prefer to address issues  rather than individuals but he was the only 
person in my Twitter feed who  objected to the New York Times article, so he 
gets some free publicity.  Obviously, Twitter is not peer-reviewed so we 
needn't read much into comments  there, I say all kinds of zany stuff, and Mr. 
Silberman was probably just  writing off the cuff, but he lives in San 
Francisco, which is a hotbed of  anti-science beliefs, so if they really think 
they 
are part of American  mainstream thinking, and that their numbers include 
just as many Republicans, it  may be a big part of the problem of why the 
left doesn't accept science, yet  think they do. 

Even if the data bore you, there are other easy ways  to see anti-vaccine 
beliefs are a left-wing thing. "The Daily Show", hardly  shills for the 
American political right, _ridicules the left for its anti-vaccine beliefs_ 
(http://www.science20.com/cool-links/democrats_are_losing_the_war_to_claim_the_ant
ivaccination_movement_is_bipartisan-138085) . It wouldn't  be funny doing 
it about the right because it is clearly not true. _Alabama is a Republican 
state and has 99.5% vaccination rates_ 
(http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/washington_or_alabama_who_more_pro_science-79868)
 ,  Mississippi has 
basically 0% exemptions. Vaccine denial is strongest in bastions  of 
progressive thought like California and Washington. 

California  anti-vaccines rates have skyrocketed - double in the last few 
years - and Mr.  Silberman could drive over the Golden Gate bridge to Marin 
county _and take a poll of how many families attending a school with a  
shocking 26% vaccination rate vote Republican_ 
(http://www.marinij.com/marinnews/ci_23880569/number-marin-children-without-vaccinations-continues-grow-health)
 ,(1) but we  already know the answer to that based on voter registration. 
Maybe it would be  dismissed as coincidence that the vaccination rate almost 
identically matches  the percentage of Republicans (2) but not to people 
who want  real answers to pressing questions, even if they are uncomfortable  
answers.

_Professor Mike Eisen_ (http://www.science20.com/profile/michael_eisen)  of 
U.C Berkeley is also no shill for the  right wing but he wrote about Marin 
County's 80% Democrats and corresponding  lack of vaccine acceptance:

I said progressives and not liberals or Democrats for a reason. As noted in 
 Science Left Behind, New York is not the same kind of Democratic as  
California, there is almost no commonality between a liberal New York cop and a 
 
San Francisco progressive out to undermine GMOs and vaccines. They are both  
simply "Democrats" in a two-party system, so I specifically named 
progressives  distinctly because we know liberals are not the problem - 
scientists in 
academia  are overwhelmingly liberal - and Democrats are not the problem. 
The most  Democratic continental US state (3) _is Maryland and they have an 
exemption rate under 1%_ 
(http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6021a4.htm?s_cid=mm6021a4_w) , 
almost  as good as those Republican states.

Thus, the problem is progressives,  just as I said. If you hear or read 
someone who claims to be liberal but is  primarily interested in bans, 
government rules and social authoritarian control,  that is a progressive. They 
are 
as distinct from liberals as the Moral Majority  on the right is distinct 
from fiscal conservatives.  Progressive thinking  corresponds to 
anti-vaccination and even anti-GMO beliefs, which is why  Washington state, 
Oregon and 
California are so prominent in the denial movement  and New York State is less 
so. Anti-science progressives used to get a free pass  from fellow 
Democrats but fortunately for everyone those days are gone. Even the  President 
would not be exempt. _In 2008, Senator Obama said he thought vaccines might 
cause  autism_ 
(http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/what_do_barack_obama_john_mccain_and_tom_cruise_have_common_scientific_illiteracy)
 . He wouldn't be 
able to say something so silly today, liberals in  science have shown they 
are willing to turn on people who spout dangerous  nonsense, even if they 
vote the same  way.(4) 

California has been famous for wackiness  for a few decades now, they 
stopped being the state of Ronald Reagan way back in  the 1980s and are firmly 
in 
the hands of social authoritarian progressives now,  and that means they 
hate science as much as anyone on the religious right does -  they just hate 
different kinds of science.

The thing that makes  progressives scarier than right-wing science deniers 
is that people on the right  don't deny anything that will kill people. If 
some crank school district tries  to deny evolution, no one is going to die 
and it just makes them look backward  and stupid. Denying food, medicine and 
energy science, like progressives do, is  costing lives.

Science Left Behind did not change all of that  yet, but here's hoping...


Notes:

(1) Good luck  getting people in Marin to admit being Republicans, even if 
20% of them are. _They have to keep it secret_ 
(http://www.marinij.com/marinnews/ci_10878266?IADID=Search-www.marinij.com-www.marinij.com)
  because, 
like often happens in an  overwhelming majority, diversity and tolerance 
quickly get thrown out. What few  Republicans are there just want to be able to 
attend a PTA meeting without  getting their houses egged so they keep it to 
themselves.

(2) Marin County has actually not been the worst for its Whooping Cough  
rate this year. _Left-wing hotbeds Napa and Berkeley are beating it in 2014_ 
(http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/immunize/Documents/Pertussis_report_9-15-2014
.pdf) .  Besting them all is Humboldt, derided as "Granolaville" by even 
the left-leaning  residents of California for its far-out culture.  Humboldt 
is wealthy, 82%  white and only 25% Republicans - which is representative of 
a whole lot of  anti-vaccine people in general. 

(3) Hawaii is the  most Democratic US state _but they are now driving 
"Haole Activists in the Democratic party"  (i.e. progressives) out of office_ 
(http://www.science20.com/cool-links/hawaii_driving_out_antiscience_haole_activi
sts_in_the_democratic_party-143267)  and back to California, they  say.

(4) Republicans are no better - when a Discovery  Institute scientific 
know-nothing writing in a prominent conservative  publication _tried to 
demonize 
mitochondrial science related to IVF_ 
(http://www.science20.com/science_20/if_national_review_wants_scientists_take_conservatives_seriously_jettison_dis
covery_institute-117371) , the  right wing magazine that pays him dutifully 
ignored the fact that the  institution that funds him is as anti-science as 
Joe Mercola.  

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to