The Daily Signal
 
 
It’s the Culture, Stupid: Welfare Programs Can’t  Solve Economic Gap 
Created by Marriage Decline

 
 
November 09, 2014 
 
_Stephen Moore_ (http://dailysignal.com/author/stephen-moore/)   / 
_@StephenMoore_ (http://twitter.com/StephenMoore)   
Stephen Moore, who formerly wrote on the economy  and public policy for The 
Wall Street Journal, is chief economist at The  Heritage Foundation. 

 
This may be a surprising statement from a bleary-eyed, number-crunching  
economist, but the best anti-poverty program in America may not be tax cuts,  
debt reduction or regulatory relief, but rather that old-fashioned 
institution  called marriage. It turns out that poverty rates are very low 
among 
intact  families and prevalent among homes without a father. Children who grow 
up in  single-parent households are much more likely to face economic trouble 
as  adults. 
Those who cheer divorce as a form of women’s liberation, or who say that  
stigmatizing out-of-wedlock births is just right-wing sermonizing, just don’t 
 get this intertwined connection between two-parent households and economic 
 success. Sociocultural factors like the decline of marriage are leading 
causes  of the wealth gap and the stubborn poverty trap in many low-income  
neighborhoods. This isn’t to say that children who grow up in broken homes can’
t  succeed—millions heroically do. It doesn’t mean that every marriage was 
meant to  be; many times, divorce is the only option.
 
 
Still, what is irrefutable is that marriage with a devoted husband and wife 
 in the home is a far better social program than food stamps, Medicaid, 
public  housing or even all of them combined. This conclusion is made clear by 
a new  eye-opening and sometimes depressing report called the _Index of 
Culture and Opportunity_ (http://index.heritage.org/culture/)   by my 
colleagues 
at the Heritage Foundation. It’s conclusion: We must reshape  our culture 
before we can ever hope to make a big dent in the number of poor  households. 
Some of the cultural indicators are going in a positive direction. Violent  
crime is down. So is the number of abortions.
 
 
However, in other ways, we are ripping our families and our society apart.  
Consider these statistics on family breakup. 
“From 2001 to 2011, the marriage rate dropped by 10.3 marriages per 1,000  
unmarried women, or 22.8 percent. Since the 1960s, it has fallen by about 50 
 percent.” 
According to one of the report’s scholars, _W. Bradford Wilcox_ 
(http://index.heritage.org/culture/marriage-rate/) ,  “only about half of the 
nation’s 
adults are currently married, and about half of  the nation’s children will 
spend some time outside an intact, married home.”  Those numbers are much 
higher in low-income communities. In some cities such as  Detroit and Newark, 
N.J., two of every three children are born out of wedlock.  Name a 
government program that can take the place of a father.
 
This troubling trend appears to be a roadblock to the American Dream. One  
study by Harvard economist Raj Chetty and his colleagues finds that when it  
comes to what is preventing the economic upward mobility of poor children, “
the  strongest and most robust predictor is the fraction of children with 
single  parents.” 
It’s also true and often overlooked that family breakup creates a 
statistical  illusion that we are making less economic progress than we 
actually are. 
For  example, if a married couple earns $80,000, but then ends up in 
divorce, there  are now two households earning $40,000 so it appears the 
economy 
is slipping and  average household income is falling. In fact, what has 
slipped is the  culture. 
Meanwhile, birthrates are also falling. In only two of the past 40 years 
have  birthrates exceeded replacement-level fertility of 2.1 children per 
couple. Who  will take care of and finance the retirement of the 76 million 
baby 
boomers?  Thank goodness for immigration. The population bomb that was once 
famously  worried about by scholars such as Paul Ehrlich has become a 
population  fizzle.
 
Most economists agree that the sharp decline in the share of Americans  
between ages 18 and 64 who are working is a major economic hindrance. This isn’
t  just happening by chance—but rather as a result of policy and cultural 
shifts.  The value of work is denigrated in our modern society—and welfare has 
been  elevated. Millions of jobs are there for the taking if the unemployed 
and  underemployed go out and obtain useful skills. But our culture too 
often frowns  upon Americans doing what are regarded as grimy, blue-collar jobs—
even though  they can pay $60,000 to $100,000 a year. This may explain why 
it is so hard to  get a plumber or carpenter or any kind of handyman these 
days.
 
We also seem to disparage the idea of young people, especially teens,  
working. We parents spoil our children—and I’m no less guilty than others—with  
leisure and money, and many millennials have come to think that to pull 
them  away from the TV, computer or Gameboy screen is an offense that is 
reportable to  child-protective services. This new report reminds us of the 
obvious: There is  dignity, character-building and self-sufficiency in all 
forms 
of labor. 
The Obama administration now runs TV and radio ads assuring welfare  
recipients they should feel no shame whatsoever in taking a handout and even  
tells them that the more they live off the expense of someone else (taxpayers), 
 
the better it is for the economy. Liberals are trying to bend the culture 
in a  subversive direction. Given that last year we had 47 million on food 
stamps, the  left is succeeding. 
We economists bury ourselves in the data and formulas to try to devise 
policy  solutions to raise the living standards of workers and families. It’s 
humbling  to realize how much of our nation’s economic success is based on a 
culture of  virtue. Do the right thing, as Spike Lee would put it. To save 
our economy from  a path of decline, we need to start with a personal and 
national commitment to  sturdy families, strong parents and a re-emergence of 
the Protestant work ethic.  That shouldn’t be so hard.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to