Real Clear Politics
 
 
 
Lee Kuan Yew (1923-2015)
By _Thomas Sowell_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/thomas_sowell/)  - March 24,  2015
 
It is not often that the leader of a small city-state -- in this case,  
Singapore -- gets an international reputation. But no one deserved it more than 
 Lee Kuan Yew, the founder of Singapore as an independent country in 1959, 
and  its prime minister from 1959 to 1990. With his death, he leaves behind 
a legacy  valuable not only to Singapore but to the world. 
Born in Singapore in 1923, when it was a British colony, Lee Kuan Yew 
studied  at Cambridge University after World War II, and was much impressed by 
the  orderly, law-abiding England of that day. It was a great contrast with 
the  poverty-stricken and crime-ridden Singapore of that era
 
 
Today Singapore has a per capita Gross Domestic Product more than 50 
percent  higher than that of the United Kingdom and a crime rate a small 
fraction 
of that  in England. A 2010 study showed more patents and patent 
applications from the  small city-state of Singapore than from Russia. Few 
places in 
the world can  match Singapore for cleanliness and orderliness. 
This remarkable transformation of Singapore took place under the  
authoritarian rule of Lee Kuan Yew for two decades as prime minister. And it  
happened despite some very serious handicaps that led to chaos and  
self-destruction in other countries. 
Singapore had little in the way of natural resources. It even had to import 
 drinking water from neighboring Malaysia. Its population consisted of 
people of  different races, languages and religions -- the Chinese majority and 
the sizable  Malay and Indian minorities. 
At a time when other Third World countries were setting up  
government-controlled economies and blaming their poverty on "exploitation" by  
more 
advanced industrial nations, Lee Kuan Yew promoted a market economy,  welcomed 
foreign investments, and made Singapore's children learn English, to  maximize 
the benefits from Singapore's position as a major port for  international 
commerce. 
Singapore's schools also taught the separate native languages of its 
Chinese,  Malay and Indian Tamil peoples. But everyone had to learn English, 
because it  was the language of international commerce, on which the country's 
economic  prosperity depended. 
In short, Lee Kuan Yew was pragmatic, rather than ideological. Many 
observers  saw a contradiction between Singapore's free markets and its lack of 
democracy.  But its long-serving prime minister did not deem its people ready 
for democracy.  Instead, he offered a decent government with much less 
corruption than in other  countries in that region of the world. 
His example was especially striking in view of many in the West who seem to 
 think that democracy is something that can be exported to countries whose  
history and traditions are wholly different from those of Western nations 
that  evolved democratic institutions over the centuries. 
Even such a champion of freedom as John Stuart Mill said in the 19th 
century:  "The ideally best form of government, it is scarcely necessary to 
say, 
does not  mean one which is practicable or eligible in all states of 
civilization." 
In other words, democracy has prerequisites, and peoples and places without 
 those prerequisites will not necessarily do well when democratic 
institutions  are created. 
The most painful recent example of that is Iraq, where a democratically  
elected government, set up by expenditure of the blood and treasure of the  
United States, became one of the obstacles to a united people with the 
military  strength to protect itself from international terrorists. 
In many parts of the [Islamic] Third World, post-colonial governments set 
up  democratically made sure that there would be no more democracy that could 
 replace its original leaders. This led to the cynical phrase, "one man, 
one vote  -- one time." 
Democracy can be wonderful as a principle where it is viable, but 
disastrous  as a fetish where it is not. 
Lee Kuan Yew understood the pitfalls and steered around them. If our 
Western  advocates of "nation-building" in other countries would learn that 
lesson, it  could be the most valuable legacy of Lee Kuan  Yew.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to