Is it just me?  But as much as I may criticize the  Republicans
(sometimes they really need it) I cannot recall similar widespread  denial
after any recent election that the GOP lost.
 
 
BR
 
------------------------------------------------------
 
 
Commentary
 
 
 
Democrats Descend into Madness
 
_NOAH  ROTHMAN_ (https://www.commentarymagazine.com/author/noah-rothman/)  
/ _DEC. 16, 2016_ 
(https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/democrats-descent-into-madness/)
 


 
 
It’s been more than six weeks since Donald Trump’s victory in the  
presidential election and Democrats are not yet fully reconciled to the 
prospect  
of a Trump presidency. By endorsing just about every daft conspiracy theory 
that  crosses their transom, liberals appear set on delaying that process of  
reconciliation for as long as possible. 
 
Depending on how inclined toward charitability you are, former  Hillary 
Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s op-ed in the_Washington  Post_ 
(https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/john-podesta-something-is-deeply-broken-at-
the-fbi/2016/12/15/51668ab4-c303-11e6-9a51-cd56ea1c2bb7_story.html?utm_term=
.050f7839e63a)  on Friday claims  that the FBI is either partisan, corrupt, 
or just plain riddled with  incompetents. “Comparing the FBI’s massive 
response to the overblown email  scandal with the seemingly lackadaisical 
response to the very real Russian plot  to subvert a national election shows 
that 
something is deeply broken at the  FBI,” Podesta wrote. Indeed, while both 
are produce, comparing apples to oranges  will leave fans of one or the 
other fruit disappointed. 
 
As a direct target of Russian hacks, Podesta has earned his grievance.  His 
contention, however, that the FBI devoted too many resources to Clinton’s  
case is revisionist history. What he calls the “infamous letter” written by 
FBI  Director James Comey to Congress just 11 days prior to the election 
didn’t  result from the investigation into Clinton but rather the 
investigation into  Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s husband, former Representative 
Anthony 
Wiener. It’s  hardly the FBI’s fault that the probe into the allegation that 
Weiner was  carrying on lewd conversations online with minors turned up 
emails from Hillary  Clinton’s illicit State Department server. Nor was it 
incompetent for FBI  Director Comey to observe his duty to keep Congress 
informed 
of developments in  the Clinton case. 
Podesta’s nuanced gripes about the FBI are allowing less sophisticated  
voices on the left room to settle comfortably into a position of outright  
lunacy. Take, for example, _New  York Times_ 
(khttp://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/opinion/useful-idiots-galore.html?rref=collection/column/paul-krugman&action
=click&contentCollection=opinion&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=la
test&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection) opinion writer Paul Krugman. The 
Nobel Prize-winning  economist alleged on Friday that the FBI has become “
highly partisan, with  distinct alt-right sympathies.” Without evidence, he 
contends that no one could  doubt that the Feds and the Russian leaks of 
Democratic emails cost Hillary  Clinton about 1 percent of the vote in swing 
states. Therefore, “Yes, the  election was hacked.” 
The left’s refusal to come to terms with Trump extends to trying to  compel 
the Electoral College to ignore the will of their states’ voters and deny  
the real estate mogul the presidency. A _variety of celebrities_ 
(http://time.com/4603254/celebrities-electoral-college-donald-trump-video/)  
urged the 
College to  deny Trump the presidency by re-litigating issues well-trodden 
during the  campaign. Sober-minded voters were aware of Trump’s erratic 
comments, his  refusal to release his tax returns, and his consciously 
illiberal 
foreign fans  when they walked into the voting booth. They voted for him 
anyway. 
Vox.com’s Elizabeth Plank _makes this case_ 
(https://twitter.com/voxdotcom/status/809769447053463552)  by virtue of Trump’s 
refusal to divest  from his 
personal interests, thus flirting with the violation of the Emoluments  
clause of the Constitution. It is no one’s responsibility to preempt potential  
violations of the Constitution before they occur. Congress and the 
president  can, and often do, violate the Constitution. The level of impunity 
to 
which they  are privy for these infractions is a function of the separation of 
powers and  the willingness of the branches of government to enforce their  
sovereignty. 
This is not harmless. This establishes conditions familiar to those on  the 
right who observed as the conservative movement became susceptible to  
hijacking by conspiratorial thinkers. Attacking the Electoral College by  
redefining its role establishes a threshold for civic responsibility that 
cannot  
be met. Those who do not abide by an arbitrary and irrational standard of  
conduct will be dubbed traitors by those who count themselves ideologically 
pure  and committed. 
Those liberal commentators who do not ease themselves into the fever  
swamps with the likes of Paul Krugman will not be able to compete in the new  
left media economy, in which currency is earned by striking the most  
uncompromising stance. This poisonous alternate universe becomes ever more  
critical 
to those for whom it becomes a source of identity. It renders them  bitter, 
alienated toward objective reality, depressed, and increasingly  dependent 
on those irresponsible commentators who tell them what they want to  hear. 
Primed, those desperate and bewildered partisans then go ahead and donate  a 
few bucks to obviously fraudulent causes, like Green Party presidential  
candidate Jill Stein’s recount. 
Democrats are allowing themselves to stew in their worst impulses, some  of 
which are reinforced by unscrupulous advantage-seekers. For the sake of the 
 nation’s political sanity, let’s hope cooler heads emerge dominant from 
this  process of reconciliation and  renewal.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to