Reposted with a larger font. :-)

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/28/opinion/tom-cotton-fix-immigration-its-what-voters-want.html

Fix Immigration. It’s What Voters Want.
December 28, 2016
Op-Ed Contributor

Donald J. Trump smashed many orthodoxies on his way to victory, but immigration 
was the defining issue separating him from his primary opponents and Hillary 
Clinton. President-elect Trump now has a clear mandate not only to stop illegal 
immigration, but also to finally cut the generation-long influx of low-skilled 
immigrants that undermines American workers.

Yet many powerful industries benefit from such immigration. They’re arguing 
that immigration controls are creating a low-skilled labor shortage.

“We’re pretty much begging for workers,” Tom Nassif, the chief executive of 
Western Growers, a trade organization that represents farmers, said on CNN. A 
fast-food chain founder warned, “Our industry can’t survive without Mexican 
workers.”

These same industries contend that stricter immigration enforcement will 
further shrink the pool of workers and raise their wages. They argue that 
closing our borders to inexpensive foreign labor will force employers to add 
benefits and improve workplace conditions to attract and keep workers already 
here.

I have an answer to these charges: Exactly.

Higher wages, better benefits and more security for American workers are 
features, not bugs, of sound immigration reform. For too long, our immigration 
policy has skewed toward the interests of the wealthy and powerful: Employers 
get cheaper labor, and professionals get cheaper personal services like 
housekeeping. We now need an immigration policy that focuses less on the most 
powerful and more on everyone else.

It’s been a quarter-century since Congress substantially reformed the 
immigration system. In that time, the population of people who are in this 
country illegally has nearly tripled, to more than 11 million. We’ve also 
accepted one million legal immigrants annually — and a vast majority are 
unskilled or low-skilled.

Some people contend that low-skilled immigration doesn’t depress wages. In his 
final State of the Union address, President Obama argued that immigrants aren’t 
the “principal reason wages haven’t gone up; those decisions are made in the 
boardrooms that too often put quarterly earnings over long-term returns.” Yet 
those decisions are possible only in the context of a labor surplus caused by 
low-skilled immigration. In a tight labor market, bosses cannot set low wages 
and still attract workers.

After all, the law of supply and demand is not magically suspended in the labor 
market. As immigrant labor has flooded the country, working-class wages have 
collapsed. Wages for Americans with only high school diplomas have declined by 
2 percent since the late 1970s, and for those who didn’t finish high school, 
they have declined by nearly 20 percent, according to Economic Policy Institute 
figures.

No doubt automation and globalization have also affected wages, but mass 
immigration accelerates these trends with surplus labor, which of course 
decreases wages. Little wonder, then, that these Americans voted for the 
candidate who promised higher wages and less immigration instead of all the 
candidates — Republicans and Democrats alike — who promised essentially more of 
the same on immigration.

America has always offered a basic deal: If you’re willing to work hard and 
play by the rules, you can make a better life for yourself and your kids. But 
without good wages, this deal seems impossible, which is one reason so many 
Americans think their children will be worse off than they are. These Americans 
see cheap immigrant labor as a way to enrich the wealthy while creating a near 
permanent underclass for whom the American dream is always just out of reach.


Interactive Feature | Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter Every weekday, 
get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, the Times editorial 
board and contributing writers from around the world.

Yet, as if Mr. Trump’s campaign never happened, companies in labor-intensive 
industries want to sustain or even increase current immigration flows. It’s not 
hard to understand why. Cheap labor helps the bottom line. It is hard to 
understand why so many politicians would go along. The short-term interest of 
businesses isn’t the same as the long-term national interest.

Our country, like any country, needs borders and must decide who and how many 
can cross those borders. We must make this decision with the well-being of all 
our citizens in mind. Today, that means a large reduction in legal immigration 
and a reorientation toward ultra-high-skill immigrants.

This policy would resemble the immigration systems of Canada and Australia, 
countries with similar advanced economies. While our system gives priority to 
reuniting extended families and low-skilled labor, their systems prize 
nuclear-family reunification and attributes like language skills, education and 
work experience. A similar system here would allow in immigrants like doctors 
to work in rural areas while not pushing down working-class wages.

In some quarters, proposals like these invoke cries of “nativism” and 
“xenophobia.” But recent immigrants are the very Americans who have to compete 
with new immigrants for jobs. Far from being anti-immigrant, this proposal 
would give recent arrivals a better shot at higher wages, stable work and 
assimilation.

We have an immigration policy today that few Americans support or voted for. 
It’s allowed legal and illegal immigration at levels divorced from what our 
economy needs. That has undermined the earning power of those Americans least 
able to afford it.

But in this election, Americans finally demanded an end to this unthinking 
immigration system. President-elect Trump and Congress should take that mandate 
and act on it promptly in the new year.



Sent from my iPhone

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to