This post excerpts Edward D. Hess and Katherine Ludwig’s new book Humility Is 
the New Smart: Rethinking Human Excellence in the Smart Machine Age 
(Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., 2017).



To Excel in the Smart Machine Age, We Need Others | Darden Ideas to Action
https://ideas.darden.virginia.edu/2017/01/to-excel-in-the-smart-machine-age-we-need-others/
(via Instapaper)

In the coming Smart Machine Age (SMA), humans will be needed to do the jobs 
that technology won’t be able to do well: jobs requiring higher order critical, 
creative and innovative thinking and emotionally engaging with others. 
Unfortunately, the science is clear that we are not naturally good at those 
skills because of our reflexive ways of thinking and behaving. A profound 
problem for us in executing those uniquely human SMA Skills is that we usually 
perceive and process the outside world in an inwardly focused, self-protective 
manner.

Staying relevant and optimizing our thinking, listening, relating and working 
with others in order to excel at those SMA Skills will require us to become 
more of an open system — more open to what’s going on in the world outside our 
heads and more open to others. Our inward focus will need to change to an 
outward focus with respect to others because it’ll be very hard for most all of 
us to excel at the SMA Skills by ourselves. We’ll need the help of others, and 
that requires that we emotionally relate and connect to them.

“Otherness”

Connecting to and emotionally relating with other human beings is fundamental 
to human motivation. That’s not anecdotal; science has proved it over and over. 
This need to belong with and attach to others is something innate across 
cultures, ethnicities and gender. Many studies have shown that connecting 
emotionally and building relationships are not just about finding love and 
friendship and being happy in our personal lives; they’re embedded within our 
drive to live, learn and succeed.

Research shows that students who emotionally connect with a teacher do better 
in school, employees who emotionally connect with coworkers are more 
productive, and emotional connection improves client and customer service. We 
know this intuitively without the data, yet we don’t seem to understand or 
acknowledge the fact that our tendencies to be self-obsessed and our 
individualistic, hypercompetitive culture are often at odds with making these 
emotional connections and building these meaningful relationships at work.

That’s a real problem in the SMA because higher-level thinking requires us to 
connect with other people who can help us get past our biases. It’s also 
crucial to engaging in the kind of teamwork and collaboration that leads to 
creativity and innovation. Most important, as of yet, smart machines, robots 
and AI cannot fully replace the kind of empathetic emotional and social 
connections that humans have with other humans. Being able to hone our 
emotional and social skills remains one of our few advantages. The bottom line 
is that in the SMA very few of us will succeed on our own. We’ll need the help 
of others, which means we’ll need to be the kind of people whom others will 
want to help.

That requires much more than being “nice”: It means being a trustworthy helper 
in return.

Connecting and Building Trust

How does one build trust? False modesty and going through motions won’t work. 
Research supports the fact that we’re all pretty perceptive in determining 
insincerity and recognizing when people are only out for themselves, which just 
further undermines trust. Would you trust someone who always has to win or be 
right? Would you trust someone who views you as a competitor or a means to an 
end? Would you trust someone who is arrogant, self-promoting, a glory hog and 
refuses to take ownership of his or her mistakes? Would you trust someone who, 
when challenged, becomes defensive and refuses to really engage?

Barbara Fredrickson describes the biochemistry and neuroscience of meaningful 
platonic relationships in Love 2.0. They require us, she said, to “escape our 
cocoon of self-absorption” — a phrase that goes to the root of Humility. 
Relationship building also requires that we be willing to invest ourselves in 
the well-being of another solely for his or her sake and not because there’s 
something in it for us, according to Fredrickson. It’s something I (Ed) had to 
learn the hard way.

In my first leadership position in investment banking on Wall Street, I had 
high-producing teams. My style was very much “get it done.” I led by example, 
never asked my people to do anything I wouldn’t do myself, and believed that 
integrity, truthfulness and treating all people with dignity were 
nonnegotiable. I told my team that if they produced, I would get them raises 
and bonuses and help them get promotions and/or further schooling. But what I 
didn’t do was to get to know them as individuals.

During those same work years, I failed to turn off my work mode when I got 
home. In my wife’s words, I had become a business machine devoid of emotions 
and incapable of emotionally engaging and caring about her as a person. She 
told me that I needed to change, or she was out. It was then that I sought out 
a highly trained, well-respected executive coach. She helped me understand how 
meaningful relationships would add so much to my life and yield better outcomes 
at home and work. But it would require a lot of hard work by me.

She was right. I learned that if I took the time to really get to know my work 
teams individually over lunches and frequent personal check-ins, magical things 
would happen. It seemed the more they felt that I truly cared about them as 
human beings — not just as a means to my success — the more successful they 
were and in turn I was. It took time to connect and relate. It takes authentic 
caring because you can’t fake this stuff.

The more I slowed down and took the time to get to know my team, the more we 
connected and the more I legitimately did care about them. The more honest I 
was with them about me personally, the more they trusted me and were open and 
honest with me about their personal hopes, dreams, fears and so forth. They 
always knew that they had to perform, but now they also knew that I was there 
for them personally because I cared about them as people. And I really did. 
That took our work conversations to a higher level of openness, and that led to 
better thinking and innovation.

In his book Humble Consulting: How to Provide Real Help Faster, Edgar Schein 
says that these types of more personal, open and trusting work conversations 
overcome “professional distance” and lead to what he calls “Level 2 
relationships.” Like him, we believe that we build such higher-quality 
relationships by investing time in really getting to know each other through 
humble inquiry and dialogue: asking open-ended personal questions, exhibiting 
an authentic caring attitude toward the other person, and disclosing personal 
thoughts and feelings.

A recent company-wide research project at Facebook showed the importance of 
this. In 2016, Facebook disclosed the findings of a study of its 
highest-performing teams. The purpose was to learn what the managers did to get 
that high performance. The number one finding was that high-performance 
managers at Facebook cared about their team members. Likewise, decades of 
research by Gallup Inc. on its Q12 Employee Engagement diagnostic have shown 
that the most important factor in job satisfaction is how your boss treats you.

This post excerpts Edward D. Hess and Katherine Ludwig’s new book Humility Is 
the New Smart: Rethinking Human Excellence in the Smart Machine Age 
(Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., 2017).

Roy Baumeister and Mark Leary, “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal 
Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation,” Psychological Bulletin 117, No. 
3 (1995): 497–529.

Barbara Fredrickson, Love 2.0: How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We 
Feel, Think, Do and Become (New York: Penguin, 2013), 10.

Edgar H. Schein, Humble Consulting: How to Provide Real Help Faster (Oakland, 
CA: Berrett-Koehler, 2016), 15.

Ibid., 23.

Richard Feloni, “Facebook’s HR Chief Conducted a Company-Wide Study to Find Its 
Best Managers and Seven Behaviors Stood Out,” Business Insider, January 27, 
2016, www.businessinsider.com/.

About the Faculty


Edward D. Hess

Hess is a top authority on high-performance businesses, with a focus on organic 
growth and innovation strategies, systems and processes, and servant 
leadership. His current research examines how to use the science of learning to 
create a leading-edge learning organization.

Hess’ books include The Physics of Business Growth: Mindsets, System and 
Processes, co-authored by Darden Professor Jeanne...   Learn More



Sent from my iPhone

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to