August 20, 2017
 
The Neo-Nazis at the Charlottesville demonstrations a week ago
were as sickening as Neo-Nazis usually get. They are infantile,  uninformed,
and bigoted. Their mindless anti-Semitism is indefensible. However, 
who is worse, the Neo-Nazis or Antifa, America's nihilists /  Anarchists?
I don't know who is worse but the fact is that there is   -or  should be-
a real debate on the question. Both are indefensible.
 
The news media is right to condemn the Neo-Nazis. However, while
some news people have, in fact, been critical of Antifa, Chuck Todd
and PBS most notably, others, like the worthies as CNN, have
decryed any comparison of rival forms of evil. For CNN's people
the only real evil is on the political Right, the political Left
is beyond reproach.
 
When even the SPLC condemns Antifa you know that we are discussing
a particularly vile and criminal organization  -which I say with mixed  
emotions
since my disdain for the Southern Poverty Law Center is no secret
and I generally detest that organization. But this time it got things  
right.
Antifa is a threat to everyone else. Antifa consists of violent  crazies.
 
What else is lost in all the hullabaloo are the valid grievances of the  
alt-Right. 
This is not some sort of defense of the alt-Right but a simple  statement
of fact: It does no-one the least good to put black people  on some
kind of pedestal as if skin pigmentation that has African origins
makes someone morally superior to others, as if white people
are all racists, as if African-Americans never need to answer to
the endemic violence that characterizes maybe a fourth of the
urban black population, a population that is anti-intellectual,
willingly immoral, and essentially anti-education in outlook.
 
Just maybe a large segment of the white population sees this
and is disgusted and revolts against political establishments that
pander to the black underclass for political advantage. Which is
mostly to speak of urban Democrats but also to discuss
the Bush wing of the Republican Party. 
 
These are the same people who pander to Muslims just as thoughtlessly
as they genuflect to African-Americans.
 
This said, nothing excuses the virulent anti-Semitism of the far  Right.
There is plenty of anti-Semitism on the Left, also, of course. In  total
there is even more anti-Semitism on the Left, in fact.  On  that score
America's universities are starting to resemble Germany's  universities
in the 1930s, but nobody should ignore the 'classic' anti-Semitism
of the Neanderthal Right. 
 
For the record, although I have said this repeatedly over the years,
I regard anti-Semitism as stupid beyond belief, inexcusably immoral,
and ridiculous. Not that individual Jews may not deserve criticism,
that is hardly the case, Jared Kushner for openers, Ruth Bader Ginsburg,
Rachel Maddow, George  Weinberg, Paul Krugman whenever he
opens his mouth about politics, among  others,  merit all the criticisms
anyone can offer. But to identify Jews en bloc  as some kind of
enemy of the people is an absurdity. And doing  so is pure scape-goating
which has the effect of excusing oneself from  being honest about one's
own shortcomings and  failures.
 
Which is especially odious given the fact that  we have real enemies
whom Neo-Nazis habitually ignore since, you  see,  the lord and  savior
of  the Nazi movement, Hitler himself, was pro-Islam and a friend  of
the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Mohammed Amin al-Husseini, who was 
an honored guest of the Third Reich and  given responsibility for 
organizing 
Muslim SS units in the Balkans to  exterminate Jews. Instead of 
protesting against Islam the Neo-Nazis  vent their anger at Jews;  
this makes no sense at all. 
 
Which is to say that we do not need the  far Right and we do not need the 
far Left and each can go to  hell   -where they belong. It is the disgrace 
of the 
American news media that it has extreme  difficulty in admitting that 
there even is a problem on the Left. 
 
It is anything but accidental that I am  a Radical Centrist who is 
disgusted 
at both the Democratic Party and the  Republican Party.  
 
 
 
Billy
 
 
-----------------------------------------------------
 
 
Editorial
 
 
Calmer voices on the left  must disavow antifa’s tactics — or else they 
will give rhetorical ammunition to  Trump

 
 
 
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Sunday, August 20, 2017,

 
 
The  disgusting resurgence of white supremacists in 2017 America, aided and 
abetted  by a White House engaging in toxic moral equivalence, has gotten 
an assist from  a tiny left-wing cadre. 
This  loosely organized band calls itself antifa (“anti-fascist”), and — 
unlike the  broad coalition of activists arrayed in opposition to much of the 
Trump agenda —  its members unapologetically embrace violence as the only 
sufficiently strong  answer to those they see as enemies, even when those 
enemies are engaging in  nonviolent protest. 
Down  this road, madness lies. 
In  a civil society — fingers crossed, that’s what this still is — 
unprovoked  violence is illegal and wrong no matter who is on the receiving 
end. 
The answer  to speech is speech, not sticks and stones. 
Just  as important, antifa activists make a fateful strategic mistake by 
stealing  initiative and attention from far more admirably behaved fellow 
travelers, which  in turn gives the likes of President Trump license to blame “
both sides” for  violence that one side far more clearly provoked. 
Rewind  to the start of the chaos in Charlottesville to understand the 
pernicious  dynamic. A group of “alt-right” protesters were gathering, 
ostensibly motivated  by the proposed removal of a Confederate statue, but in 
fact 
to celebrate  anti-black racism and anti-Semitism. 
Their  promotional materials used Nazi and Confederate imagery. Their 
chants insisted  “Jews will not replace us.” Their leaders openly embraced the 
vile notion that  the United States is for white Christians and no one else. 
Though some carried  no arms, many flaunted assault rifles, clearly to 
intimidate anyone who dare  confront them.
 
 
These  were — and remain — the bad guys. 
Hundreds  if not thousands of counterprotesters gathered to oppose them, 
nonviolently.  They chanted, shouted, sang songs, in the best tradition of 
American activism.  Contrary to Trump’s assertion, they had full legal 
permission to protest. 
That  was the asymmetric reality: immoral and sometimes violent 
intimidators and their  enablers, met primarily by righteous, peaceful 
protesters . 
Then  antifa activists, sometimes masked, sometimes wielding pepper spray, 
bricks and  other weapons, entered the equation. Intent on viewing virulent 
expressions of  racism as violence, they were bent on initiating conflict. 
Among  their victims were journalists. Taylor Lorenz of The Hill was 
punched in the  face by an antifa for recording a fight between the two groups; 
she tweeted that  her assaulter told her not to “snitch, media bitch.” A 
videographer from  Richmond’s WTVR covering a counter-protest got a concussion 
from head blows with  a stick. 
Of  course, the single most violent act in Charlottesville was committed a 
the  radical right-wing terrorist who drove his vehicle into a crowd. But 
antifa  activists helped accelerate the anarchy. 
This  is what they do. In Berkeley, Calif., earlier this year, antifa 
vandalism and  assaults on conservative attendees forced cancellation of 
speeches 
by Milo  Yiannopolous and Ann Coulter. 
In  April, antifa groups warned off Trump supporters from marching in the  
110-year-old Portland, Ore., Rose Festival: “We will have 200 or more people 
 rush into the parade . . . and drag and push those people out.” Fearing 
that the  police couldn’t contain violence, festival organizers cancelled the 
event. 
A  violent movement that seeks to strike fear into the hearts of not just 
hate  groups, but legitimate right-of-center individuals and organizations, 
has no  place in a democratic society. 
Calmer,  smarter voices on the left must vocally disavow antifa’s tactics. 
Or else they  will give rhetorical ammunition to President Trump, himself no 
stranger to  inciting violence, as he dishonestly conflates his ideological 
enemies and  deviously blurs bright moral lines.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to