This is being passed along for file purposes  only. 
I doubt if anyone here will actually read it. Maybe  in 
the past some few souls might have done so but those  years  
have come and gone.  And this would seem to apply  even if 
Ross Douthat himself was a "card carrying" member of  RC.org. 
He means a great deal to me but I don't see where this  is 
true for anyone else except maybe now and  then. 
I don't think my past perceptions of the group are in  error, 
certainly not in any  basic sense. There once was a  period when 
intellectual curiosity mattered very much.  As it  still does to  
a few in the group. But let's face it. What is  "interesting" 
to the nexus of today's group is non-news,  non-controversy, 
or non-'philosophical' unless these matters are  understood 
in the sense that controversy can only exist within  gentlemen's 
limits, that "news" means jokes told on late night TV  comedy shows, 
and "philosophy" means a set of ideas that supports  career choices 
that have no relationship to serious and  soul-searching 
quest for truth. 
Still, I found Ross Douthat's article very worthwhile;  and while 
I have not been pursuing his line of thought on the  subjects  
he discussed, my own ideas have been evolving on  a 
parallel set of tracks. Way I look at it now, thanks to  Douthat, 
is that we are set  for -or getting close to-   something like a 
"reformation" among Evangelicals, at least  among 
younger believers, and that when this breaks into the  open 
traditional Evangelicalism will be consigned to the  margins 
of the movement in due course.  
Luther had it right:  Religious faith necessarily  must be something 
that combines heart and mind, that does not give primacy  to 
feelings no matter how important feelings always are,  because, 
you see,  we are rational beings and human reason  needs 
nourishment as much as the physical body needs  nourishment. 
The great weakness in contemporary Evangelicalism is  that 
this fundamental truth has only the most modest  purchase 
on the minds of believers  -as if none have ever  bothered 
to read the fist chapter of the Book of Romans  -the  whole 
first chapter, including the philosophical  stuff. 
For Luther, next to the Gospels, Romans was the most  important 
text in the New Testament, indeed, it is essential to  everything else. 
Sorry, but I cannot think of a single Evangelical of  stature 
who has any such outlook. 
Hence, as Douthat observed among younger Christians,  a 
slow but sure drift into eastern Orthodoxy. Certainly  this is true 
for me even if my drift all along has simultaneously  been 
into contemporary heterodoxy that is based on  Biblical scholarship. 
Excellent article even if it may have almost no meaning  to the group 
as it now exists. 
Billy 
------------------------ 
New York  Times 
Is There an Evangelical  Crisis?
_Ross  Douthat_ (https://www.nytimes.com/column/ross-douthat)  NOV. 25, 2017

 
_Continue  reading the main story_ 
(https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/25/opinion/sunday/trump-evangelical-crisis.html?mtrref=www.google.com&assetType=opin
ion#story-continues-1) Share This Page
 
    *   _Share_ (javascript:;) 







 
 
About 20 years ago, the eminent sociologist of religion  Christian Smith 
coined a useful and resonant phrase, describing evangelical  Christianity in 
the post-1960s United States as both “_embattled  and thriving_ 
(http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/A/bo3683361.html) .” 
By this Smith meant that evangelicals had maintained an  identity in a 
secularizing country that was neither separatist nor assimilated,  but somehow 
mainstream and countercultural at once. Evangelicals were both fully  part of 
American modernity (often educated suburbanites, rather than the  backwoods 
yokels of caricature) and also living lives in tension with  pluralistic 
and permissive values. And this combination, far from undercutting  their 
communities, was actually a source of religious vitality and demographic  
strength. 
Smith’s description still holds up pretty well. The story  of American 
religion lately has been one of institutional decline, of Mainline  
Protestantism
’s aging and Catholicism’s weakening and the rise of the so-called  “nones.
” 
But there has been an evangelical exception. The  evangelical market share 
has held steady while other traditions have declined,  evangelical churches 
have continued to _win  more converts than they lose_ 
(https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/evangelical-protestants-are-the-biggest-winners-when-people-c
hange-faiths/) , and _evangelical  resilience_ 
(http://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2015/may/pew-evangelicals-stay-strong-us-religious-landscape-study
.html)  is the main reason  why religious conservatism retains an intense 
and active core. 
The question is whether this  resilience will survive the age of Trump. 
Some evangelical voices think not:  Whether the subject is the debauched pagan 
in the White House, the mall-haunted  candidacy of Roy Moore or the larger 
question of how to engage with secular  culture, there is talk of an 
intergenerational crisis within evangelical  churches, a widening 
disillusionment 
with a Trump-endorsing old guard, a feeling  that a crackup must loom 
ahead._Continue  reading the main story_ 
(https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/25/opinion/sunday/trump-evangelical-crisis.html?mtrref=www.google.com&assetType=opinion
#story-continues-2) 

 
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT
_Continue  reading the main story_ 
(https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/25/opinion/sunday/trump-evangelical-crisis.html?mtrref=www.google.com&assetType=opin
ion#story-continues-3)   




 
 
In a recent cri de coeur on the  influential Gospel Coalition site, _Jared  
Wilson described_ 
(https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/jared-c-wilson/theologically-orphaned-generation/)
  younger  evangelicals as “basically a 
bunch of theological orphans,” betrayed by older  pastors who insisted on the 
importance of moral character and then abandoned  these preachments for the 
sake of partisanship — revealing their own commitments  as essentially 
idolatrous, and leaving the next generation no choice but to  invent 
evangelicalism anew.


 
 
In a somewhat different vein, the Baylor professor Alan  Jacobs _responded 
to a  question_ (http://blog.ayjay.org/where-young-evangelicals-are-headed/) 
(from me) about where younger evangelical intellectual life is going  by 
saying that “as far as I can tell, where young evangelicals are headed is  
simply out of  evangelicalism.” Meaning that they will either go along with the 
drift of  their elders and become church-of-American-greatness heretics, or 
else they will  return to “older liturgical traditions,” Catholic and 
Orthodox and Anglican, and  cease to identify with evangelicalism entirely. 
I don’t know exactly what to make of these predictions.  American 
evangelicalism has always contained a number of different tendencies:  It’s 
home to 
rigorous heirs of the Reformation, seeker-sensitive megachurches,  would-be 
ecumenical “mere Christians,” prosperity preachers and hard-edged  Christian 
nationalists. 
During the 2016 Republican primary, it was _easy  enough to argue_ 
(https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/10/opinion/campaign-stops/donald-trumps-christian-so
ldiers.html?_r=0)  that Trump was  exploiting these divisions, winning Fox 
News-watching cultural evangelicals and  prosperity-gospel types while 
losing churchgoers who cared about character and  orthodoxy. 
Then in the general election it was possible to argue that  the latter 
groups only came around to Trump reluctantly, out of fear of  contemporary 
liberalism’s anticlerical streak, and that their relationship to  his 
identitarian nationalism was transactional and didn’t reflect any deep  
congruence. 
If this is right, then the alienation of younger  evangelical writers from 
Trumpism’s court pastors could indeed be a signifier of  a coming 
evangelical crackup. In this scenario the label itself would _become  
contested_ 
(http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2017/10/16/burying-word-evangelical/) 
, 
with the kind of winsome and multiethnic evangelicalism  envisioned by the 
anti-Trump Southern Baptist _Russell  Moore_ 
(https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/opinion/christians-in-the-hands-of-donald-trump.html)
  pitted against 
the  nationalist evangelicalism of a Jerry Falwell Jr. or Robert Jeffress, and 
 churches along the fault line internally embattled and dividing. 
But it’s also possible that evangelical intellectuals and  writers, and 
their friends in other Christian traditions, have overestimated how  much a 
serious theology has ever mattered to evangelicalism’s sociological  success. 
It could be that the Trump-era crisis of the evangelical mind is a  parochial 
phenomenon, confined to theologians and academics and pundits and a  few 
outlier congregations — and that it is this group, not the cultural  
Christians who voted enthusiastically for Trump, who represent the 
real_evangelical  
penumbra_ 
(https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/30/opinion/sunday/douthat-the-christian-penumbra.html)
 , which could float away and leave evangelicalism less 
intellectual,  more partisan, more racially segregated ... but as a 
cultural phenomenon, not  all that greatly changed. 
If so, then this would imply that white Christian  tribalism and a very 
American sort of heresy, not a commitment to scripture and  tradition, has kept 
evangelical churches thriving all these years. And if the  God-and-country, 
pray-and-grow-rich tendencies sweep aside orthodox resistance,  the 
evangelicalism that emerges might be more coherent and sociologically  
resilient, 
in the short run, for being rid of hand-wringers who don’t think  Baptist 
choirs should set “Make America Great Again” _to  music_ 
(https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/07/12/another-make-america-great-again-so
ng-this-one-from-evangelicals-is-trump-approved/?utm_term=.54b0e2c27559) .
 
 
 
This is a sobering idea, and one I hope is  wrong. 
But it is a paradox of  this strange time that serious evangelicals should 
probably be rooting for a  real post-Trump crisis in their churches — 
because its absence will tell them  something depressing about where their 
movement
’s strength lay all  along.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [RC] [ ... BILROJ via Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community

Reply via email to