Taski's Magazine
2013: A Race Odyssey<http://takimag.com/article/2013-a-race-odyssey/>
by Steve Sailer <http://takimag.com/contributor/Steve%20Sailer/6>
[http://takimag.com/images/global/feed-32x32.png]
<http://takimag.com/contributors/contributor_feed/Steve%20Sailer/6>
October 10, 2018
<http://takimag.com/article/2013-a-race-odyssey/#><http://takimag.com/article/2013-a-race-odyssey/#>
[2013: A Race Odyssey]
photo credit: BIgstock
With the spectacular failure of clinical psychologist Dr. Prof. Christine
Blasey Ford’s vague charges against Brett Kavanaugh to elicit any corroborating
evidence, moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt’s new book about the apparent
epidemic of politics-related mental illness that began around
2013<http://takimag.com/article/kkk_is_the_new_ufo_steve_sailer/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI>,
The Coddling of the American
Mind<https://www.amazon.com/Coddling-American-Mind-Intentions-Generation/dp/0735224897/vdare>,
is exceptionally timely.
The spirit of the age cries out for tales of victimization, and,
unsurprisingly, the supply has grown to meet the skyrocketing demand. What does
it say about our culture that we just witnessed a professor of psychology be
vastly praised for testifying to a purported chain of events without any
additional evidence emerging that it wasn’t all just in her head?
Jonathan
Haidt<http://takimag.com/article/the_replication_crisis_and_the_repetition_crisis_steve_sailer/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI>
is also a professor of psychology, at NYU’s Stern business school. He’s best
known for his 2012 best-seller The Righteous
Mind<http://takimag.com/article/the_self_righteous_hive_mind_steve_sailer/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI>.
Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an
article, Taki's Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don't get paid
for their work. Email [email protected] to buy additional rights.
http://takimag.com/article/2013-a-race-odyssey/print#ixzz5TeArpwcA
Haidt joined up to write his new book with another old-fashioned liberal, Greg
Lukianoff<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Lukianoff>, head of the Foundation
for Individual Rights in Education<https://www.thefire.org/> (FIRE), an NGO
founded in 1999 to be a more principled and relevant updating of the ACLU.
Their new book is called The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions
and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure. It’s a hybrid combining
the kind of political books I’ve been reviewing lately, such as Francis
Fukuyama’s
Identity<http://takimag.com/article/delusion-on-campus/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI> and
Heather Mac Donald’s The Diversity
Delusion<http://takimag.com/article/delusion-on-campus/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI>, and a
self-help guide for parents who don’t want their children to melt down over
perceived
microaggressions<http://takimag.com/article/the_cult_of_microaggressions_steve_sailer/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI>
when they go off to college.
That college students suffer a lot of mental health troubles is not something
that our research universities have been enthusiastic about researching.
Now, this campus plague appears to be getting worse, so it’s worth considering
whether the increasingly crazed ideologies dominating campuses are exacerbating
student melancholy. If our culture constantly tells young people that they are
subliminally being hexed by sexism and racism, should it be a surprise if they
plunge into despair like Haitians convinced they are the victims of voodoo?
(The authors, by the way, endorse cognitive behavioral
therapy<https://psychcentral.com/lib/in-depth-cognitive-behavioral-therapy/>
that works to replace self-destructive habits of mind with constructive ways of
thinking.)
“Can a culture built on animus and lies build healthy self-confidence in youth?”
Haidt and Lukianoff identify three debilitating messages our culture is
increasingly sending to young people:
What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker.
Always trust your feelings.
Life is a battle between good people and evil people.
Amusingly, this helps explain why so many people found Blasey Ford’s
allegations so convincing.
Today’s counter-Nietzschean<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_3_GyW6omY>
conventional wisdom about how college students must have their entire campus be
a safe space to protect them from the verbal violence of, say, Heather Mac
Donald<http://takimag.com/article/more_hysterics_on_campus_steve_sailer/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI>
or else their lives will be ruined forever echoes Blasey Ford’s contention
that she was made permanently weaker by being pawed by a cute boy at some
uncertain time and place.
That Blasey Ford has enjoyed a fairly kick-ass life combining
surfing<http://takimag.com/article/surfer_privilege_steve_sailer/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI>,
perhaps the most superbly addictive of hobbies, with a modest degree of
professional success is irrelevant because of Rule 2: Always trust your
feelings. If the menopausal Blasey Ford (age 51) feels, at this moment, as if
the Republican Supreme Court nominee must pay for her life being devastated, as
she feels it was (no matter how much surfing in Tahiti she has squeezed in),
then he must. Requiring evidence in support of accusations is the outdated
bigotry of dead white males.
Finally, all this makes more sense as long as you keep in mind that Life is a
battle between good people and evil people. Blasey Ford is good and Kavanaugh
is bad, and what more do you need to know?
But how can you tell who are the good people and who are the evil people? Well,
just look for, say, white privilege. Brett Kavanaugh is white, he went to an
expensive prep school, and his father belonged to a country club, so you know
he is bad.
Admittedly, Christine Blasey went to an even more expensive prep school and her
father was president of Burning
Tree<https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1983/04/17/burning-tree/f0f3b825-2f57-4fc2-91e8-3d266d8c39cc/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.41521bd72645>
golf club, where numerous presidents have been members.
But the Theory of Intersectionality explains that some types of people, such as
women, are just morally more deserving than other types of people, such as men.
Exactly which flavor of person is at the tippy-top of the intersectional totem
pole is not a subject that the Democratic coalition can afford to discuss if it
hopes to hold together. But at least all Democrats can be urged to come
together in hating the cishet white male common enemy at the bottom.
Anyway, if you are still confused, just remember that good people punch up, not
down. So just look for who is being punched and, by definition, they are on top
and therefore they are a bad person who deserves being punched.
But are these popular theories conducive to human happiness? For example,
comedy is increasingly coming under suspicion as undermining the dogmas of
diversity. But is a world in which humor is no laughing matter one that is good
for mental health?
A question that Haidt and Lukianoff don’t quite articulate is whether the fear
is related to the loathing. Is the current level of hatred for white people
that is regularly expressed in the prestige press and in academia good for the
souls of either the haters or the hated? Can a culture built on animus and lies
build healthy self-confidence in youth?
A remarkable fraction of current articles in The New York Times and The New
Yorker include testimony that the author feels emotionally traumatized, which
is stereotypically attributed to the malevolence of Donald Trump. But the
evidence in The Coddling of the American Mind points to the second Obama
administration as being the era when the national nervous breakdown began.
The authors cite alarming evidence of a recent increase in emotional problems.
For example, the percentage of college students who said they suffered from a
“psychological disorder” increased among males from 2.7 percent in 2012 to 6.1
percent by 2016 (a 126 percent increase). Over the same four years, the
percentage of coeds who saw themselves as psychologically afflicted rose from
5.8 percent to 14.5 percent (150 percent growth).
Haidt and Lukianoff are somewhat impressed by the data assembled in
psychologist Jean M. Twenge’s new book iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids
Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy—and Completely
Unprepared for
Adulthood<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1501152017/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_taft_p1_i0>.
Twenge theorizes that the rise of
smartphones<https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/has-the-smartphone-destroyed-a-generation/534198/>
and social media from 2007 onward has made the teenage years a living hell of
status anxiety and call-out culture for kids born from 1995 onward. She calls
this postmillennial generation “iGen.”
I find Twenge’s research interesting; but keep in mind that psychology has
suffered a replication crisis (in part because psychology is pseudoscientific
enough to tolerate a lot of sloppy work but also, unlike the newer “grievance
studies” that were recently
hoaxed<http://www.unz.com/isteve/sokal-hoax-of-2018/>, scientific enough to
feel bad about it). So, I’d like to see Twenge’s claim of a sharp generational
break between those born in the early ’90s versus the late ’90s exposed to more
critical examination.
Haidt and Lukianoff aren’t wholly persuaded by Twenge blaming the smartphone,
but they theorize that the arrival of iGen on college campuses in 2013 drove
administrators into their misguided new ideology of “safetyism.”
As the authors admit, it’s not fair to describe today’s young people as
“coddled.” (Presumably, their title The Coddling of the American Mind was
chosen to alliteratively recall philosopher Allan Bloom’s surprise 1987
best-seller The Closing of the American
Mind<https://www.amazon.com/Closing-American-Mind-Education-Impoverished/dp/1451683200>.)
On average, kids these days grew up filling in more worksheets and raising
less hell than previous generations.
But, as the authors emphasize, they were raised with a greater emphasis on
physical safety (e.g., backyards now have fewer trampolines and diving boards).
Still, how the rise in helmet wearing translates into, say, Prof. Eric
Clanton<http://takimag.com/article/the_emmett_till_effect_steve_sailer/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI>
bashing Trump supporters on the head with his bike lock is less than
transparent. And why these gradual changes in child-rearing over the decades
would suddenly lead to an outbreak of collegiate hysteria in 2013 is opaque.
Likewise, all the hubbub about safety fears over free speech seems less like
genuine worry than like a feminized version of turf marking to justify
demeaning rivals.
I suspect, instead, that the most important difference on campus between 2012
and 2013 was that in 2013 the Obama administration no longer had to worry about
reelection and thus didn’t have to continue to put up a moderate front. As I
had predicted in my 2008 book America’s Half-Blood
Prince<https://www.amazon.com/Americas-Half-Blood-Prince-Barack-Inheritance-ebook/dp/B001TOD6MK#customerReviews>,
in their second term the future was now for the Obamaites, and it was time to
get while the getting was good.
Some outbursts of campus activism might be genuinely bottom-up, but the mania
we saw during the second Obama administration is more reminiscent of Chairman
Mao’s top-down Cultural
Revolution<http://takimag.com/article/mao_and_again/#axzz532VQntHQ>.
Haidt and Lukianoff report on one example of how the White House helped unleash
the demons lurking within diversity worship:
In 2013, the Departments of Education and Justice issued a sweeping new
definition of harassment…. By eliminating the reasonable person standard,
harassment was left to be defined by the self-reported subjective experience of
every member of the university community. It was, in effect, emotional
reasoning turned into federal regulation.
We must believe the woman, even if, in the case of Blasey Ford, those who know
her best don’t seem to believe her.
The authors point out that one big difference in the new morality of implicit
bias is that sinners don’t even have to want to commit a sin:
…intent is not even necessary. If a member of an identity group feels offended
or oppressed by the action of another person, then according to the
impact-versus-intent paradigm, that other person is guilty of an act of bigotry.
They go on to compare the current hysteria to the Salem witch trials.
But I would suggest that a more relevant comparison during our Diversity Age
might be to African fears of witchcraft. As the late anthropologist Henry
Harpending<https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2012/01/15/my-friend-the-witch-doctor/>
noted during his years of research in Africa, a big difference between
traditional European and contemporary African conceptions of witchcraft is that
in Africa intent is not required to hex victims, just bad feelings toward them.
Emotions get projected over vast distances, so beware.
Indeed, the current concepts of “systemic racism” and “implicit bias,” as
promulgated on campuses by African-American Studies departments, sound an awful
lot like African tribal notions of witchcraft. In Africa, for example, white
privilege protects whites from racism witchcraft. Educated Herero in Namibia
explained to Harpending:
Even more interesting to us was the universal understanding that white people
were not vulnerable to witchcraft and could neither feel it nor understand it.
White people literally lack a crucial sense, or part of the brain. An upside, I
was told, was that we did not face the dangers that locals faced. On the other
hand our bad feelings could be projected so as good citizens we had to monitor
carefully our own “hearts.”
Henry concluded:
A colleague pointed out a few weeks ago, after hearing this story, that if
[this conception of witchcraft] is nearly pan-African then perhaps some of it
came to the New World. Prominent and not so prominent talkers from the American
Black population come out with similar theories of vague and invisible forces
that are oppressing people, like “institutional racism” and “white privilege.”
Does this sound increasingly familiar?
The main solution among Africans for the evils of witchcraft is to pay money to
witch doctors to protect them, rather as campus diversicrats are always ready
to collect sizable
checks<http://takimag.com/article/delusion-on-campus/#axzz5TQ2bjzEI> to fight
the curse of subliminal racism and sexism for you.
Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an
article, Taki's Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don't get paid
for their work. Email [email protected] to buy additional rights.
http://takimag.com/article/2013-a-race-odyssey/print#ixzz5Te9Zbhih
--
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
