Ernie:

About monks I cannot say; nuns, of course, regard Jesus as their husband and

their vows are a spiritual version of a wedding ceremony.


About love per se, Evangeline once brought up the subject when we were 
discussing

bad choices in life partners, specifically my sister's choice of an utter loser 
as her

live-in boyfriend, a character who had no talents of any kind, who was a leech,

who had a rather vapid personality (to call it a personality at all), and not 
very bright

to cap it all off.


The relationship lasted until nearly his death from COPD after 30 years.  Those 
years,

looked at objectively, were years my sister utterly threw away.  Everyone 
concerned

could see the obvious with total clarity,  my niece, my siblings, the 
neighbors, etc

but not my sister, she continued to make excuses for him year after year.


That is, we may rhapsodize about love but an objective analysis of the 
phenomenon

might do us some real good.


This includes love of Jesus.



To repeat, there may well be very good reasons for emotional feelings at the 
time

of a religious conversion and at times of crisis  -and let's add deeply felt 
thanksgiving

for a special blessing of some kind.


To use sexual metaphor, you love the woman who one day will become your wife,

with extreme passion. How long can that last?  I can vouch that 2 or 3 years 
after

marriage is a distinct possibility. But beyond that?  For that matter, for a 
lot of people

if the honeymoon lasts as much as a year that is a miracle.


Eventually the passionate "in heat" phase of a relationship   -while memory of 
that time

may never fade out-  comes to an end and a new kind of love arises based on 
shared values

and interests, on mutual respect, and so forth.  Seems to me this is inevitable.


Now think about Jesus in the context of Christian faith.  For a while, after 
first becoming

a believer, a "passionate phase," a sort of bonding, makes perfectly good sense.

But how long can this really continue?  My experience was that it became

increasingly strained to try and revisit those early feelings. Yet in the 
context

of Baptist faith among Baptists I knew in those years, this was supposed to 
continue

forever, the passion was never supposed to fade.


What I came to realize that it was time for a different kind of commitment to 
Jesus
than emotion-centeredness.  The more there were pressures to persist in the 
"passion phase"
the more I felt I was lying to myself about it all.  Yet there was no theology 
of a
transition to something different, just more and more insistence that the 
emotion part
should forever persist or, at worst, be renewed as before, every so often.

Not possible.   And I felt that something was wrong about Baptist theology.

That was the Baptist part of the equation; for Pentecostals the situation is 
even worse
as I see it.

Ross Douthat, in his 2010 book, said something similar about himself.  Besides, 
what about
all the questions you are able to ask as you grow older? Questions that, in 
conscience,
you feel you must ask and that there must be good answers. In Douthat's case, 
from
his late teens to mid 20s, this was his pattern also.  In my case, from late 
teens to early 20s.
Then a major change took place and a lot of seeking and exploring and eventually
a rediscovery of Christian faith that I could never see before  -by that time 
well into
my late 30s and early 40s.

Anyway, this is my experience and no amount of talking can make me perceive what
I have, in fact,  perceived, but now supposedly "must" perceive in a different 
way.
Which is hardly,  in rough outline, all that unique; many other people have 
gone through
a similar transformation in their lives.  And for good reason.

Not to go through this kind of transformation is what raises questions.

How is it possible to remain a "true believer" Evangelical?  This uses the 
phrase "true believer"
in Hoffer's sense.  In a political context such a person would be an ideologue. 
Less kindly,
a fanatic.  For which there are plenty of religious analogues.


Never thought of Jesus as a general, not remotely, nor a guru, instead as a 
true friend,
an ideal to live up to, and a special presence in my life.   Simple as that.

He was also an historical person whom I have tried to learn as much about
as possible given the sketchy nature of our sources, a life that, when analyzed
in its context, is endlessly fascinating with mysteries still to be solved.


Billy




________________________________
From: Centroids <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:53 PM
To: Billy Rojas
Cc: Centroids Discussions
Subject: Re: Redemption Re: [RC] 2016 2017 2018 2019... &

Hi Billy,

> The feeling I have, and this goes back a long way, is that Jesus-centeredness 
> to the extent that we get something like 'Jesus intoxication.'  is of a piece 
> with Bakhti Yoga

Ah, I can see where you’re coming from.

I didn’t mean this in (just) the “Jesus is my boyfriend” sense. I meant the 
“Jesus is my guru and my general” sense.

I was surprised to discover that monks think spiritual marriage to Jesus is 
like a honeymoon.  Rather than mortgages and housecleaning and raising kids...

E

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to