travelfotografer wrote: 
> I do know that with EDO, Touch works with 24/192 FLAC (with LMS772). But
> why go for the lesser 24/96 when 24/192 is available, please elaborate?
> 
> Thanks,
> Leon

They sound the same and cost less :)

There is no point with them and they work with a standard Touch (,see my
signature for a good link).
24/96 is more than enough as an end user format for human consumption
,more is just more not better .
Note that i mean home playback there are a lot reasons to run the studio
equipment at very high rates as they do all sort of stuff with it.

Unless the provider of the files are bit shady and the different rates
offered are not from the same master or maybe you don't trust their way
of  converting stuff :-/
For example with HD tracks you never know the original could have been
an old 16/48 master even for the 24/192 .
(lets not even touch the topic if 24/192 for 45 year old analog
recordings it equals using a gallon bucket for carrying a cup of water
)
I Also collect some hirez stuff myself ,but be aware that much if is not
what it says on the tin , a large percentage of SACD are fakes too for
example.

If you feel that or have information that a certain 24/192 version
actually are the best master available by all means get it , but these
bit-rates is one the least important infos on if a master is a good or
not. it has become a sales moniker some good remasters are packaged as
24/96 or 24/192 .
But thatÂ’s not why they are good , a new CD version of these better
version would also be fantastic too but a harder sell to audiophiles .

Knowing that you can convert it to suitable formats for your own use and
actually don't loose sound quality 

But this is bit off topic .


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97432

_______________________________________________
Radio mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/radio

Reply via email to