Hi Adrian, Thanks for the link to your Redmine instance; I'll keep an eye on that.
- David On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Adrian Thurston <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David, > > Yes this is the right place. Thank you for your submission. The mailing list > has always been low volume and special purpose lists aren't really > warranted. > > The issue is now tracked in the new redmine instance I've started using for > my open source projects. > > http://www.complang.org/redmine/issues/155 > > Regards, > Adrian > > On 11-02-03 01:41 PM, David Yip wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> Not sure if this is the right place to send patches, but I didn't see >> anything that looked more appropriate on >> http://www.complang.org/ragel/. (Of course, if I missed it, let me >> know.) >> >> The attached patch contains three changes: >> >> (1) Implementation of the -L option for Ruby code generation by >> suppressing all "# line ..." output. This isn't the same thing as >> what the C/D code generator does, but IMO is the closest >> interpretation for Ruby code. The patch is modelled after the >> existing behavior for C/D code generation. >> (2) A change to the option listing to signal Ruby as a target language >> for which -L is available. >> (3) A change that corrects a typo in the option listing ("direcives" >> -> "directives"). >> >> The patch was generated using git diff, but should apply cleanly with >> e.g. GNU patch. >> >> Suggestions and comments welcome. >> >> Thanks, >> >> - David >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ragel-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users > > _______________________________________________ > ragel-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users > _______________________________________________ ragel-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
