Applied to trunk.
On 11-02-03 10:51 PM, David Yip wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the link to your Redmine instance; I'll keep an eye on that.
- David
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Adrian Thurston<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi David,
Yes this is the right place. Thank you for your submission. The mailing list
has always been low volume and special purpose lists aren't really
warranted.
The issue is now tracked in the new redmine instance I've started using for
my open source projects.
http://www.complang.org/redmine/issues/155
Regards,
Adrian
On 11-02-03 01:41 PM, David Yip wrote:
Hello all,
Not sure if this is the right place to send patches, but I didn't see
anything that looked more appropriate on
http://www.complang.org/ragel/. (Of course, if I missed it, let me
know.)
The attached patch contains three changes:
(1) Implementation of the -L option for Ruby code generation by
suppressing all "# line ..." output. This isn't the same thing as
what the C/D code generator does, but IMO is the closest
interpretation for Ruby code. The patch is modelled after the
existing behavior for C/D code generation.
(2) A change to the option listing to signal Ruby as a target language
for which -L is available.
(3) A change that corrects a typo in the option listing ("direcives"
-> "directives").
The patch was generated using git diff, but should apply cleanly with
e.g. GNU patch.
Suggestions and comments welcome.
Thanks,
- David
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
