I see no point in holding back either. I was at CoR as well and saw the same stuff. I thought it was cool, but it's not as groundbreaking as you might think.
Comet uses iframe hacks and armageddon uses a flash "hack". Yes, I said hack. :) Although the solution looks much cleaner, I don't believe it to be as portable a solution because of the use of flash, but does that matter??? I don't know, we'll see I guess. Looking forward to seeing more info on Armageddon though. On 4/21/06, Eric Woodward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's lame. Please ruin the "surprise". > > --ejw > > Eric Woodward > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On 20-Apr-06, at 6:27 PM, Giles Bowkett wrote: > >> Are we rewriting a complete messaging infrastructure software in > >> Rails > >> here or is there a way of doing this that's so incredibly clever and > >> simple that I've completely missed it. > > > > There is a way of doing this that is so incredibly clever and simple > > that you've completely missed it. > > > > I got to see it at Canada on Rails and I think you'll see it soon > > enough. I'd tell you but I don't want to ruin the surprise. > > > > -- > > Giles Bowkett > > http://www.gilesgoatboy.org > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-core mailing list > > Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-core mailing list > Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core > _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
