On 8/8/06, Michael A. Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Heinemeier Hansson wrote: >> So...is this intentional? Would core be open to a patch that allowed AR >> to differentiate between "nil -- this association needs to be loaded" >> and "nil -- the target is actually nil"? > > Yes, please do investigate something better. I believe it was done > simply because it was easy at the time.http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5757
Good stuff, applied. Now to figure this out for eager associations... :) -- Rick Olson http://techno-weenie.net _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
