This caused a breakage: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5767
-Jonathan. On 8/9/06, Rick Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/06, Michael A. Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Heinemeier Hansson wrote: > >> So...is this intentional? Would core be open to a patch that allowed AR > >> to differentiate between "nil -- this association needs to be loaded" > >> and "nil -- the target is actually nil"? > > > > Yes, please do investigate something better. I believe it was done > > simply because it was easy at the time. > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5757 Good stuff, applied. Now to figure this out for eager associations... :) -- Rick Olson http://techno-weenie.net _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
_______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
