I'd be more than happy to rave about Cucumber - but I won't be at the next meeting (or several after that) unfortunately.
Kirk: I find it to be a really clean and clear way to test features by stepping through multiple pages (I still write model and controller specs as well). I've been using it for about 6 months, and it quickly became part of my core testing setup. -- Pat On 02/04/2009, at 1:35 PM, Torm3nt wrote: > > I'm not from melbourne but I think this is an interesting discussion > in it's own right. I'm still yet to be convinced why cucumber is a > good idea, considering (to me) it looks to complicate things, rather > than simplify. That said, I haven't actually played with it yet so > this is just first impressions =P > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Mike Bailey <[email protected]> > wrote: >> A couple of months Pete asked the Melbourne Ruby Group what people >> are >> excited about. >> >> A lot of people mentioned testing: cucumber, rspec, shoulda, >> integrity ci, >> mocks, not using mocks, etc. >> >> Would anyone else be interested in a night dedicated to short talks >> introducing peoples favourite test tools/practices and why they >> love them? >> >> Is testing in Ruby more enjoyable than in other languages? Perhaps >> the night >> could interest non-ruby programmers also? >> >> - Mike >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
