Hi Pat, Cheers for the info - is this something you combine with selenium?
Kirk On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd be more than happy to rave about Cucumber - but I won't be at the > next meeting (or several after that) unfortunately. > > Kirk: I find it to be a really clean and clear way to test features by > stepping through multiple pages (I still write model and controller > specs as well). I've been using it for about 6 months, and it quickly > became part of my core testing setup. > > -- > Pat > > On 02/04/2009, at 1:35 PM, Torm3nt wrote: > >> >> I'm not from melbourne but I think this is an interesting discussion >> in it's own right. I'm still yet to be convinced why cucumber is a >> good idea, considering (to me) it looks to complicate things, rather >> than simplify. That said, I haven't actually played with it yet so >> this is just first impressions =P >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Mike Bailey <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> A couple of months Pete asked the Melbourne Ruby Group what people >>> are >>> excited about. >>> >>> A lot of people mentioned testing: cucumber, rspec, shoulda, >>> integrity ci, >>> mocks, not using mocks, etc. >>> >>> Would anyone else be interested in a night dedicated to short talks >>> introducing peoples favourite test tools/practices and why they >>> love them? >>> >>> Is testing in Ruby more enjoyable than in other languages? Perhaps >>> the night >>> could interest non-ruby programmers also? >>> >>> - Mike >>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
