Hi all, Thank you for all of the suggestions. Really appreciate it. Seems like nginx performs better and consume less resources than Apache. I will play around with Passenger and nginx this weekend.
Cheers. On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:10 PM, chendo <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for nginx. > > The developer cares about performance. Read the first couple of paragraphs > of this page to see why: > http://docs.huihoo.com/nginx/nginx-modules-guide.html > > <http://docs.huihoo.com/nginx/nginx-modules-guide.html>Also I like the > format of the config files and it has modules for most things people use on > Apache. No real reason to stick with Apache anymore imo. Unless you have a > massive mod_rewrite rule set because you'll need to rewrite it to work with > apache. > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Mikel Lindsaar <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Daniel N <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 26 March 2010 15:36, Ben Schwarz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ngnix support has been in for at least a year. Unless you're doing mad >> >> traffic use the one that you're most familiar with. >> >> +1 >> >> Nginx has a lower memory profile if you are on a VPS with tight ram. >> But in the end, go with what you know. You don't want to be learning >> how to do stuff when things aren't working. >> >> If you don't have a preference, then it is really a flip of the coin. >> Apache has been around longer and you can find documentation for >> almost anything you can imagine. >> >> Mikel >> >> -- http://twitter.com/scrum8 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
