... and also the rather more sensible (and linked from the below) pages at:
http://blog.benward.me/post/3231388630
 <http://blog.benward.me/post/3231388630>and
http://www.adequatelygood.com/2011/2/Thoughts-on-the-Hashbang

<http://www.adequatelygood.com/2011/2/Thoughts-on-the-Hashbang>from folks at
Twitter.

My feeling is that the hash-bang is an ugly necessary evil, with a clear
migration path once enough browsers support pushState.
You can wait for ie10 - or you can use the workaround.  And if you have
enough money to spend, you can do both.

Current browser support:
http://caniuse.com/#feat=history

- Korny

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Gareth Townsend <[email protected]>wrote:

> Everyone heading down this path should read up on why Hash Bang URL's
> suck:
>
> http://isolani.co.uk/blog/javascript/BreakingTheWebWithHashBangs
>
> On 26/02/2011, at 6:20 PM, Korny Sietsma wrote:
>
> I saw this - it ties in with a lot of thinking I've had lately.
>
> I have a talk half planned on the future of web development - my personal
> feeling is that with javascript now on in the vast majority of browsers, and
> with Google at least allowing for SEO on ajax hash-bang URLs, the days of
> generating html on the server are rapidly running out.
>
> My favourite app architecture at the moment:
> - MongoDB for persistence, serving up JSON (well, BSON)
> - Sinatra for the Domain / Model layer, mostly sending JSON back to the
> browser (ok, it might have a handful of html pages, but they're rare)
> - A fat client in Javascript / JQuery on the client - possibly with MVC if
> the app is complex enough, possibly using a library (see below) - though
> rolling your own is also quite viable.
> - Handlebars.js for client-side templating, to actually build the html.
>  (and it means if you must build html server-side, you can share your
> mustache templates on both layers)
>
> And browser state managed through the dreaded # anchors.  Html5 and
> browser.pushstate might make them redundant one day, but for now they just
> work.
>
> There are many big wins if you build apps this way - not least, real
> separation of concerns, and great testability.
>
> I'd go further into this, but I have to go... might add some more later.
> Some libraries that are looking cool in this area:
> - Sammy.js
> - Backbone.js
> - Sproutcore (I believe - haven't looked at it myself, I prefer lower-level
> libraries rather than "do everything")
>
> You may say I'm a dreamer... but I'm not the only one.
>
> - Korny
>
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:02 PM, jamesl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I thought the readers here would appreciate this article:
>>
>>
>> http://peter.michaux.ca/articles/mvc-architecture-for-javascript-applications
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kornelis Sietsma  korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
> "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part
> that wonders what the part that isn't thinking
> isn't thinking of"
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
>



-- 
Kornelis Sietsma  korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
"Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part
that wonders what the part that isn't thinking
isn't thinking of"

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
or Rails Oceania" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.

Reply via email to