On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Dmytrii Nagirniak <[email protected]> wrote:
> > But what other options do we have to run 2 ruby versions? > > In this case it's self-solving: for a small environment where you can easily log in and manage it, and automation would be overkill, just use RVM. For a large environment, you can afford another server / VM with a different default interpreter. It'll certainly be cheaper than the labour cost! So yeah. My previous comments re "No RVM in production" were specific for larger environments. -- Michael Pearson The Bon Scotts; http://www.thebonscotts.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
