I don't like the idea of checked-in .rvmrc files at all - granted, I don't work with any large teams though :)
-- Pat On 28/07/2011, at 12:15 PM, Michael Pearson wrote: > The .rvmrc thing was the easiest to work around, and if we'd really needed > them, I would have either hacked/forked RVM. I'm the only developer at my > work that thinks that .rvmrc checked into a repo is a bad idea :) (gemsets? > that's what bundler is for! and we're all using ruby-1.9.2 anyway!) > > It was the constant changes to the install process / defaults that killed it > for me. > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Julio Cesar Ody <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I read it. > > http://serverfault.com/questions/227510/is-it-possible-to-skip-rvmrc-confirmation > > > > -- > Michael Pearson > The Bon Scotts; http://www.thebonscotts.com > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
