Hi Tim > what's the overall plan?
With the website, there are a few things brewing in the back of my mind at the moment, but shoring up the organisation's ownership and the contribution process is the first step. The next things that I'm thinking about revolve around changing the deploy workflow such that it requires less git-fu and behaves a little bit more how people have come to expect. The design and page organisation could use some love, too, but it's getting the job done for the moment. > btw, there's already ~20 members of the rails-oceania org and several other > repos - might it be better just to rename it? That's part of the problem at the moment :) Rails-oceania != Ruby Australia. The organisations are not the same; one exists as a formal entity, with formal direction and the responsibility that goes with those things, while the other is much more fluid and has a whole lot of history from when it was just a few dudes wanting to hack on Rails. While this is a gross generalisation of both organisations, and there is massive crossover in the membership, the contrast is reasonably accurate. The website will continue to be driven by many people - especially the people who work hard to run meet ups every month. This should be relatively painless to do via pull requests - gone are the days where you needed the "commit bit" to make a meaningful contribution to something. Cheers David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
