Oh hogwash! Get real, man. ----- Original Message ----- From: Victor Zalakos Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [RR] Women campouts
I am really puzzled. This is the kind of response I would expect back from a seven year old.
One who doesn't yet understand the simple standards of respect and self control.
The statement you made is slanderous gossip.
When a normal person hears and interprets such a statement the only thing they can interpret from it is that [putting this in the most delicate language I can muster] "unchristian" activities between members of opposing genders take place.
Interestingly Paul puts slader alongside sexually immorality, adulterers, homosexuality as qualitis which can keep one from inheriting the kingdom of God. (1 Cor 6:9-10).
Such statements are below discussion on this forum.
Or any forum for that matter.
At 09:46 PM 3/10/2001 -0500, clint grant wrote:
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Victor Zalakos
- Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:41 PM
- To: j j
- Subject: Re: [RR] Women campouts
-
- At 05:33 PM 3/10/2001 -0500, clint grant wrote:
- >Family Days is one of my favorite camps. Have one coming up in a couple
- >weeks here in North Texas District. I took my family to our Territorial
- >redezvous this summer, along with several others. Got into some trouble
- >over that one, though. According to National Policy, you cannot have a
- >Royal Ranger campout and have it co-ed. Family days camps are not royal
- >ranger camps. They are serparate. Our charter does not cover us in
- >liability issues. You hear about how good co-ed camping is in other
- >countries. But, according to a national staff member I talked with last
- >week, what you do not hear is the stories of what happens at these things.
- >Not good. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for camping with my family, and
- >until recently doing it at RR functions, but I cannot do so with a clear
- >conscience anymore. God bless.
- You cannot make a statement like.
- "Not good". Sure I can. Just did. You saw it yourself.
- What does that mean? I don't have to tell you. I am under no obligation whatsoever to do so. Legal or otherwise. Moral obligations notwithstanding. Does it imply something? You bet it does. Leaving no need for me to explain. Don't take it personally.
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
|
