See below...
In a message dated 03/01/2000 1:34:27 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Subj: RE: Girls in Royal Rangers in the USA?
> Date: 03/01/2000 1:34:27 PM Central Standard Time
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clarensau, Kerry)
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ellicott, Amy)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ('[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
>
> Thank you so much for your support. Below is Brother Trask's response to
> this situation.
>
> Kerry Clarensau
>
>
> March 1, 2000
>
> To Whom It May Concern:
>
> I want to thank both district and local church leaders for your
> overwhelming support of the new Missionettes program and materials. Also,
> to Kerry Clarensau and her team, we say a big thanks for the job they have
> done.
>
> As most of you know, Richard Mariott and his team are on an
> escalated schedule to bring to this church a new program and materials for
> Royal Rangers. You are going to be thrilled with what is forthcoming.
>
> Thus the National Office is not looking to study or form a co-ed
> program for these two ministries.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Thomas E. Trask
> General Superintendent
Thank you so much for your support. Below is Brother Trask's response to
this situation.
Kerry Clarensau
March 1, 2000
To Whom It May Concern:
I want to thank both district and local church leaders for your
overwhelming support of the new Missionettes program and materials. Also,
to Kerry Clarensau and her team, we say a big thanks for the job they have
done.
As most of you know, Richard Mariott and his team are on an
escalated schedule to bring to this church a new program and materials for
Royal Rangers. You are going to be thrilled with what is forthcoming.
Thus the National Office is not looking to study or form a co-ed
program for these two ministries.
Sincerely,
Thomas E. Trask
General Superintendent
TET:hw/dsm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 10:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Girls in Royal Rangers in the USA?
>
> I received the e-mail below recentlyand thought I'd respond to it.
>
> I (and my wife) are opposed to having girls in Royal Rangers. We prefer
> that
> our 3 daughters stay in Missionettes and our son be in Rangers without
> girls.
> BTW, our children agree.
>
> Michael Gallops
> Senior Commander, Outpost 194, Lakeview A/G
> Sectional Training Coordinator, Athens Section, North Texas District
>
> Subj: [RR] Girls in Royal Rangers in the USA?
> Date: 02/29/2000 10:04:44 PM Central Standard Time
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Soaring Golden Eagle)
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> >From: "Rick Barnhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Soaring Golden Eagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: RangerNet list server status :-(
> >Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 15:00:04 -0600
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
> >
> >Michael, If you feel that this is important enough, can you forward it to
> >the Ranger and missionette lists. otherwise I understand, Thanks
> >
> >Rick B
> >Bolivar, MO
> >-----
> >Ok, this is the second request for this, but please bear with me. I just
> got
> >a call from Linda Ankrom, our District WM Coordinator. She wanted me to
> >email all my contacts and secrecy is not an issue. She wants responses to
> >National Office by tomorrow (3/1) on everyone's feeling and concerns
> about
> >having a co-ed Royal Ranger/MIssionette program. She said the more input
> the
> >better. They are apparently having a meeting on 3/2 concerning this
> matter.
> >Obviously something is up.
> >
> >be concise (are you for it or against it)
> >add a couple of reasons
> >state your District and Position
> >please have your missionette leaders respond also
> >email your response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >Rick Barnhouse
> >SMDSPC
> >Bolivar, MO
