*Only because....<BIG 'for the boy's grin)
Let's not care who is boss or big shot!
First form patrols, then have the patrols nominate a
sr. guide..
*I for Sr.Guide useing pre-planned materials or
web sight address to lead the meeting as he and his "staff"
od patrol leaders work to plan the meeting "backchannel" as
a GOLD BAR MEETING.. and then present it to the Cyberoutpost
ala *NTC and the "perfect meeting"
*What if we ALL remained "Commander Rank" as we are in
real life ...and in the *adventure/game acted as a Ranger
in a patrol.. ala *NTC?
(*If we become bogged down with title's or "adult thinking"
we lose the spark to develop a plan to empower the boys
to leadership.. your comment about "experiance" is well
noted!)
*avoid the landmine! Go around it!
We all want to play... *even me<G>
-=A=-
> Spirit Rider wrote:
>
> All,
> Few things about the game.
> I use the word game loosely because Rangers is not a game. It is a
> ADVENTURE.
> First of all Iet's vote who gets the staff postions ect.
> Second I don't think it's fair to go by who has experiance and who
> doesn't. A guy that don't have any experiance could be as good a
> Sr. Commander as the one that has experiance. Please note I'm talking
> about experiance NOT training. A big differance.
> Third I think everone should be able to play. I don't think it's fair
> saying " You can't play because you're not in a patrol".
>
> Later,
> Noel "Spirit Rider" Bell
_______
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm
http://rangernet.org Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
