On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 16:11 -0700, Luciano Resende wrote: > You should consider that some files that currently does not have a ASF > header are that way because they use a different license and are > indeed correct.
perhaps that's the point: use RAT to detect those with different licenses > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it within the scope of RAT to optionally add licence headers > > automatically to documents that don't yet have them? > > > > If so, I may implement such a feature at some point in the near future > > using the relicensing scripts, available here in the ASF, as a starting > > point. possibly: but feel free to start here - robert
