Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 22:26 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 16:11 -0700, Luciano Resende wrote:
You should consider that some files that currently does not have a ASF
header are that way because they use a different license and are
indeed correct.
perhaps that's the point: use RAT to detect those with different
licenses
Yes, the initial idea would be to do a reporting run, this would
indicate the number of files under a non-Apache licence. Those that are
OK would need to be added to an exclude list.
Then do a re-licence run in which those not in the exclude list are
re-licenced.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it within the scope of RAT to optionally add licence headers
automatically to documents that don't yet have them?
If so, I may implement such a feature at some point in the near future
using the relicensing scripts, available here in the ASF, as a starting
point.
possibly: but feel free to start here
OK, well I have about 2000 files that need relicensing and a little
"play time", so rather than just run the scripts against the code I'll
have a bash at bringing the functionality into RAT as described above.
all sounds great :-)
patch ATA...?
this will be forthcoming. I'll move it over to the new package
structure. Might not get time for a week or so though, it's a bit busy
rounf here next week.
Ross
