On 2011-08-04, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On 08/03/11 15:00, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2011-07-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>> On 07/20/11 09:26, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>>> * licenseFamilyCategory >>>> Ends up in a metadata attribute RAT_URL_HEADER_CATEGORY and becomes >>>> the name attribute of the <header-type/> element. >>>> This is the only visual impact any of the attributes has on a plain >>>> text report. It is shown next to the file name in the list of scanned >>>> files. >>>> BUT it also ends up in a metadata attribute >>>> RAT_URL_LICENSE_FAMILY_CATEGORY and becomes the name attribute of a >>>> (second) <license-family/> Element. >>>> So we end up with two <license-family/> elements, one with the "short >>>> name" and one with the longer one. Is this intentional? The plain text >>>> report ignores those elements completely. >>> IIRC the original intent was to support license reasoning but I'd be >>> very happy to see the reporting simplified by removing them >> Removing whom, exactly? I'd propose to remove the license-family for >> RAT_URL_LICENSE_CATEGORY since its value will still be available from >> the header-type element. > works for me :-) Done Stefan
