> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg + 1 for the simple style 1
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle2.jpg + 0 fpr the simple style 2. Nice creativity!! Suresh > > Like to hear your comments. > > Rolf > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Scott Wilson <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> >> On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote: >> >>> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote: >>>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't >> have >>>>> the last one on this list. >>>> >>>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/ >>>> >>>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer): >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg >>>> >>>> - white label design by Scott Wilson: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png >>>> >>>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help >>>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list >>>> too). >>> >>> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2 and/or >> 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation. >> >> I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice! >> >>> >>> Ross >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Ate >>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Matt >>>>> >>>>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks >>>>>> like >>>>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with >>>>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go >>>>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we >>>>>> restart the logo contest? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Marlon >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >>>>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>>>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever >>>>>>>> decided on >>>>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed >> to >>>>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. >> Anyone >>>>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to >> see >>>>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written >>>>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although >>>>>>> accurate >>>>>>> to a white label). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and >> the >>>>>>> text were neater (but still script). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ross >>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) >>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >>>>>> >>>>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC >>>>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm >>>>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d >>>>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH >>>>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf >>>>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU= >>>>>> =Ehw/ >>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > *HIPPO* > Europe • Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 20 522 4466 > USA • Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway • Boston MA 02142 • +1 > 617 500 6160 > USA • San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor • Petaluma CA 94954 • > +1 877 414 4776 > www.onehippo.com • www.onehippo.org • [email protected] > > This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not > waive any related rights and obligations. > Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it > contains by other than an intended recipient is > unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by > return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
