Both logos are fine with me. Cheers, Niels
On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg > + 1 for the simple style 1 > >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle2.jpg > + 0 fpr the simple style 2. > > Nice creativity!! > > Suresh > >> >> Like to hear your comments. >> >> Rolf >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Scott Wilson <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote: >>>>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>>>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't >>> have >>>>>> the last one on this list. >>>>> >>>>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/ >>>>> >>>>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer): >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg >>>>> >>>>> - white label design by Scott Wilson: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png >>>>> >>>>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help >>>>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list >>>>> too). >>>> >>>> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2 and/or >>> 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation. >>> >>> I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice! >>> >>>> >>>> Ross >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ate >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -Matt >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks > like > the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with > Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go > with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we > restart the logo contest? > > > Marlon > > > On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > >>>>>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever > >>>>>>>>> decided on > >>>>>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and > committed > >>> to > >>>>>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. > >>> Anyone > >>>>>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd > like to > >>> see > >>>>>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand > written > >>>>>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although > >>>>>>>> accurate > >>>>>>>> to a white label). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the > label and > >>> the > >>>>>>>> text were neater (but still script). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ross >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *HIPPO* >> Europe • Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 20 522 4466 >> USA • Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway • Boston MA 02142 • +1 >> 617 500 6160 >> USA • San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor • Petaluma CA 94954 • >> +1 877 414 4776 >> www.onehippo.com • www.onehippo.org • [email protected] >> >> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not >> waive any related rights and obligations. >> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it >> contains by other than an intended recipient is >> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by >> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
