Well, JRebel does provide free licenses for open source projects, so Rave committers should be able to obtain one of those. This doesn't solve the problem for non-committers that want to contribute though, and I agree that something needs to be provided for them also.
-- Unico On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25/04/2011 08:39, Unico Hommes wrote: > >> The only way I see ATM for a faster development cycle is to use >> something like JRebel. > > Hmmm... I don't like the sound of that. JRebel is $189, that's rather alot > for someone just wanting to do a few quick fixes. I'd rather we were > configured in such a way as to be able to use whatever tools are common and > thus attract as many developers as possible. > > Is this possible with Maven? Still exploring. > > Ross > >> >> -- >> Unico >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Ross Gardler<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 24/04/2011 01:31, Ross Gardler wrote: >>>> >>>> On 24/04/2011 00:35, Ross Gardler wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 23/04/2011 23:07, Ross Gardler wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> I'll keep digging when I find a little more time, but if anyone sees my >>>> silly mistake please let me know. >>> >>> Getting a little closer, but still not working... >>> >>> I tried running from the projects context sensitive menu rather than the >>> server controller view. This opened the browser for me at >>> http://localhost:8080/rave-portal and the page loaded (with 404's for >>> each >>> gadget as the URL for them is not relative. >>> >>> I'm going to bed now, I hope someone can provide me with a simple step by >>> step process for getting this working in Eclipse for an efficient >>> edit/build >>> cycle. >>> >>> (Damn those steep learning curves with new build tools.) >>> >>> Ross >>> >>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://joemorrison.org/blog/2008/06/01/developing-web-applications-with-maven-and-eclipse-you-can-have-it-all/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >
