On 4/26/11 5:09 PM, "Raminderjeet Singh" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Thanks Ate for making it easier for eclipse development. I am
>successfully able to make everything work using your story text :).
>Though i am not able to login as i am getting Your login attempt was not
>successful, try again.

Make sure you are using the same string for username and password ie)
user:canonical pass:canonical


>
>Here is the additional information you may need and coping required steps
>from Ate's email
>
>If you already have m2eclipse and imported the project without installing
>m2e-extras( as i already used m2eclipse to import the project) then you
>need to delete the project (do not delete content) and import it again in
>eclipse.
>
>I just summarized the steps and added additional information.
>
>1. install m2eclipse and m2e-extras to eclipse following
>http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/installing-m2eclipse.html.
>2 Checkout the code from SVN using command line and build it with mvn
>before adding to eclipse.
>3 Import rave-project as "Existing Maven Project".
>4. 0pen in Eclipse the rave-shindig project properties and go to the
>"Deployment Assembly" section, you can add there additional packaging
>sources which will also be deployed to the server.
>Press Add, select Directive Type "Folder", and select the
>target/rave-shindig-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT folder.
>5 Make sure to also configure the correct Context root paths for
>rave-portal ("portal") and rave-shindig ("/") in their Eclipse project
>properties under "Web Project Settings".
>6 Deploy rave-portal to eclipse embedded tomcat server. Right Click on
>rave-project > Run As > Run on Server. you can add a server by going to
>Manually define a new server.
>
>
>Thanks
>Raminder
>
>
>On Apr 25, 2011, at 8:26 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
>> On 04/25/2011 11:05 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> On 25/04/2011 08:39, Unico Hommes wrote:
>>>
>>>> The only way I see ATM for a faster development cycle is to use
>>>> something like JRebel.
>>>
>>> Hmmm... I don't like the sound of that. JRebel is $189, that's rather
>>>alot for
>>> someone just wanting to do a few quick fixes. I'd rather we were
>>>configured in
>>> such a way as to be able to use whatever tools are common and thus
>>>attract as
>>> many developers as possible.
>>>
>>> Is this possible with Maven? Still exploring.
>>
>> I'll do my best to give some answers :)
>>
>> Its a long response, but there is quite some stuff to consider here, so
>>please bear with me.
>>
>> First of all, if you want to use Eclipse with Maven, I strongly suggest
>>*not* using the maven-eclipse-plugin. It doesn't properly handle more
>>complex and especially not multi-module projects.
>>
>> IMO the only reliable solution is using the m2eclipse plugin.
>> Before switching, make sure to remove all possible maven-eclipse-plugin
>>generated meta-data (or start from a clean svn checkout) as m2eclipse
>>explicitly refuses to load maven-eclipse-plugin initiated project
>>configurations (!).
>> With m2eclipse either directly import from svn (Materialize as Maven
>>project) or import as Maven project after a command line svn checkout.
>>
>> The sonatype Maven Eclipse book explains how to setup Eclipse with
>>m2eclipse, even if its still lacking in detail on stuff like Eclipse WTP
>>integration: http://www.sonatype.com/books/m2eclipse-book/reference/
>>
>> Note: If you want to run Tomcat embedded within Eclipse with, make sure
>>to also install the optional m2eclipe WTP plugin (m2e-extras).
>>
>> One more note: for svn integration within Eclipse you have two options:
>>subclipse and subversive. Although I haven't recently checked/reviewed
>>the subclipse plugin in my experience the subversive plugin is *much*
>>better, especially with regard to multi-module maven projects.
>>
>> Now, concerning using Eclipse WTP vs maven+cargo+optionally JRebel.
>>
>> Eclipse WTP is usable, even with Rave (more details below), but
>>definitely not perfect.
>> Part of that is caused by WTP itself: in my experience its still quite
>>buggy, quirky, slow and heavy.
>> And part of it is the still not great (but improving) maven/m2eclipse
>>integration. Especially the not yet (but see [1]) handling of war
>>overlays, which is biting us with rave-shindig, is a major pain in the
>>@ss.
>>
>> I'm not all too familiar with other IDEs like Netbeans or IntelliJ if
>>they do this better, maybe they do...
>>
>> Anyway, the "issue" with the rave-shindig module is that it is using
>>the maven-war-plugin war overlay feature. Eclipe WTP/m2eclipse simply
>>isn't aware of this, so the only things that gets deployed to the server
>>are the resources defined by the rave-shindig project itself, meaning:
>>effectively "broken".
>> To fix this in a WTP expected way, we would have to *fork* the Apache
>>shindig server project itself into the rave-shindig project, which IMO
>>isn't an option. Especially not if you check how the shindig server
>>project is build...
>>
>> However, I have somewhat of a workaround.
>>
>> First make sure you already (maven) build rave-shindig.
>> If you open in Eclipse the rave-shindig project properties and go to
>>the "Deployment Assembly" section, you can add there additional
>>packaging sources which will also be deployed to the server.
>> Press Add, select Directive Type "Folder", and select the
>>target/rave-shindig-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT folder.
>> As result, it will overlay the full rave-shindig war target folder to
>>Tomcat, and it actually works when you run the server from Eclipse.
>>
>> BTW: make sure to also configure the correct Context root paths for
>>rave-portal ("portal") and rave-shindig ("/") in their Eclipse project
>>properties under "Web Project Settings".
>>
>> Clearly, the above solution isn't perfect, but that's the status of
>>Eclipse WTP and maven integration. Hopefully with the promises from [1]
>>this might get better sometime soon.
>>
>> So what are the alternatives?
>> a) a different preferred IDE, maybe Netbeans or IntelliJ
>> b) use maven to run/manage the runtime container and use remote
>>debugging
>>
>> For a) I'm inclined to say we should allow and support developers to
>>use any IDE of their choice, which means *also* Eclipse.
>>
>> AFAIK IntelliJ Community Edition doesn't support server deployment at
>>all, nor does it have proper/full Maven or Web development integration.
>>If you want to use IntelliJ you'll then need a commercial (or free for
>>open source project) license similar to JRebel.
>>
>> Netbeans, I don't really know anymore. Never liked it as IDE but
>>nowadays it seems to have great Maven integration (so I hear).
>>
>> This leads to my own preference to go with b), at least until [1] gets
>>moving and working properly.
>>
>> By using maven/cargo to deploy and run the container we can stick to a
>>single configuration which works with all IDEs, and important: is
>>exactly the same for standalone or console based development/deployment.
>> The maven-cargo-plugin already is configured to support remote
>>debugging out-of-the-box, so remote Java debugging from
>>Eclipse/Netbeans/IntelliJ is trivial to setup.
>>
>> What then is problematic is "hot resource/code replacement" from the
>>IDE. And for that JRebel really is a killer solution which works
>>perfectly with all IDEs. Even (much) better than what you get through
>>the embedded debugging with Eclipse WTP, Netbeans or IntelliJ alone.
>>Maybe there are other alternatives to JRebel but I haven't found them
>>yet.
>>
>> I'm not saying that we all should start using JRebel, but as Rave
>>committers we can get a free (individual) license if we want: [2]
>>
>> Of course, that won't help external developers when they are not also
>>working on an open source project. Then its either use Eclipse WTP (with
>>my workaround), use a different/better IDE, or use something like JRebel
>>and pay a price.
>>
>> As a final remark I want to say that IMO none of this is related to
>>using Maven. I think the only real issue right now is the problem of war
>>overlay handling in Eclipse, which hopefully will be solved soon.
>> I see currently no practical alternative for not using a war overlay
>>for the rave-shindig project, other than forking shindig server itself.
>> AFAIK using a different build system than Maven wouldn't help here
>>either.
>>
>> Pfff, long story :)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ate
>>
>> [1] 
>>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.ide.eclipse.plugins.m2eclipse.user/6
>>018
>> [2] 
>>http://www.zeroturnaround.com/blog/javarebel-for-open-source-development/
>>
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Unico
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Ross Gardler<[email protected]>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>> On 24/04/2011 01:31, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24/04/2011 00:35, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23/04/2011 23:07, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll keep digging when I find a little more time, but if anyone
>>>>>>sees my
>>>>>> silly mistake please let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Getting a little closer, but still not working...
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried running from the projects context sensitive menu rather than
>>>>>the
>>>>> server controller view. This opened the browser for me at
>>>>> http://localhost:8080/rave-portal and the page loaded (with 404's
>>>>>for each
>>>>> gadget as the URL for them is not relative.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to bed now, I hope someone can provide me with a simple
>>>>>step by
>>>>> step process for getting this working in Eclipse for an efficient
>>>>>edit/build
>>>>> cycle.
>>>>>
>>>>> (Damn those steep learning curves with new build tools.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Ross
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>http://joemorrison.org/blog/2008/06/01/developing-web-applications-w
>>>>>>>ith-maven-and-eclipse-you-can-have-it-all/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to