[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056417#comment-13056417
]
Ate Douma commented on RAVE-63:
-------------------------------
Hi Jasha,
I think the xmlunit usage is a good example of what IMO does *not* need to be
covered in the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
The rules for what should/should not be covered by the NOTICE/LICENSE files
however are kind of scattered around and/or not descriptive enough to be easily
applied.
I'll follow up on the rave-dev@ mailing list first and try to summarize *my*
view on this as see where we get from there.
BTW: while checking up on the "rules" again, I do think we need a few more 3rd
party licenses appended still, besides the discussion about xmlunit usages and
alike (like junit).
> Provide and verify properly bundled license and notice files for all release
> artifacts
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RAVE-63
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-63
> Project: Rave
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Ate Douma
> Assignee: Ate Douma
> Fix For: 0.1-INCUBATING
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
