On 29 June 2011 14:45, Franklin, Matthew B. <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/29/11 8:43 AM, "Scott Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >On 29 Jun 2011, at 13:00, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > > > >> Unless there are any objections, I would like to make this one last > >>change > >> and push forward with the release to open up development in the trunk. > >>I > >> will assume lazy consensus, make this last change and push forward with > >> the release around 5 PM UTC. > +1 from me > >Would it be useful to create a release branch anyway? > > That is a question for the community. I was planning on only creating a > release branch for major releases (1.0, 2.0, etc). > In this phase it's a bit premature to create a release branch. If 1.0 has been released and some API change or major refactoring would break existing 1.y code, then it's time to branch. Before the 1.0 I'd wait till there's a real need for it. My €0.02 Jasha > > > > >> > >> -Matt > >> > >> On 6/28/11 11:36 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B." <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> On 6/28/11 11:33 AM, "Ate Douma" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 06/28/2011 05:24 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I will do it > >>>>> > >>>>> Can someone validate? It should be set, but I am not going to say > >>>>> "DONE" > >>>>> until everyone agrees. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Hi Matt, > >>>> > >>>> I don't even have the time to do svn up right now, but looking at just > >>>> the svn > >>>> commit message I noticed one N&L addition which I think isn't needed: > >>>> AFAIK we don't rely nor use/include anything from Zend Framework > >>>>(PHP). > >>>> The Shindig PHP version might do, but we don't use that. > >>> > >>> It was in the Shindig NOTICE file so I just added it. I didn't even > >>>think > >>> about it being the Zend PHP framework :) I will remove it once > >>>everyone > >>> else (including other mentors) take a look and note any issues. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Other than that, seems pretty good and complete to me, but if possible > >>>> I'd > >>>> prefer other mentors to also review and validate as well. > >>>> However, if none has time shortly, I'd say we probably covered the N&L > >>>> requirements (more than) good enough for a first time release. > >>>> > >>>> Ate > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > >
