Dropped general@incubator from this discussion. >-----Original Message----- >From: Ate Douma [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:49 AM >To: [email protected] >Cc: Upayavira; [email protected] >Subject: Re: Ping: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.3-incubating > >Hi Upayavira, > >Thanks for reviewing. > >I've feedback inline below. > >On 09/14/2011 10:31 AM, Upayavira wrote:
<snip> >> 2. This one is less of a deal - the convention is for artifacts to be >> named apache-$PROJECT-$BLAH, whereas this is rave-$BLAH. Could >> future >> releases be apache-rave-$BLAH? > >Yes, I agree that would be better and we surely can do that for the next >release. > >Note though, while this might be a good convention, I've seen numerous >(both >incubating and TLP) releases which have not adopted (yet) this. >Which I think is the explanation why Rave hasn't done it either. We were just >following some other projects examples. > Should we do this for maven repository artifacts as well as source and demo binaries? Does anyone who has more familiarity with Maven want to take on renaming the artifacts to apache-rave-x? If no one takes it on, I will do it before releasing on Friday.
