-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Fair enough but let me clarify I'm not complaining about the quality of 
patches.  I'm more interested in making lazy consensus less lazy.


Marlon


On 1/5/12 9:44 AM, Cooper, Sean D. wrote:
> -1 
> 
> This goes against lazy consensus and adds barriers to getting new people 
> involved.
> 
> -Sean
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marlon Pierce [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 9:39 AM
>> To: rave
>> Subject: 2+ reviewers for contributed patches?
>>
> Hi all--
> 
> I suggest as a guideline that two reviewers (or more) should review each
> patch submitted to reviews.apache.org before the patch is committed. Are
> you +1 or -1 for this?
> 
> 
> Marlon
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPBbiWAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDTLwH/3CpYLmBThy7pfp412x9Si1u
Bt13qlyoQyVY6Ys1UUzpxJWnfAQcY5TlkPRuKbDDH380LyBGdC5xzyZSAx4dA8ON
WBSL8zaqvcVXKMPTPF9XPN0YpB1xQu/+J15C1ptIQvd0FSFGWibJbUDIPhjVJYvD
twCPfKogzaOxi3t/bdzoFWFCr7h4rorcJz700fDOn6ku9UcpdKl1erDkMkSmJple
T5tE2q8Qqr8SCggsKcz6OeOBhr9jjN1StbUCCOcpqEGrDuTauMAjtSDmd5lv4lUs
yoZiXJtC8XC4N0UumAmQ6oipNywwxw9rw2Gy2rfmvsr4ud7/y8HTLRvnpUgVpVA=
=nXLv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to