I was hoping to get one more IPMC member vote on this list, so that we can just 
quickly jump through the general@ list.  If no one else can take a look before 
tomorrow evening, I will close this vote, repack the binaries and send it to 
the IMPC.

-Matt

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marlon Pierce [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 1:48 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.9-incubating Release Candidate
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I'll vote +1.  I tested the build from source and also ran the .zip and .tar.gz
>binaries.  I also verified the signatures and checksums
>(http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.9-incubating/)
>
>
>
>Marlon
>
>On 3/6/12 9:33 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>> I've reviewed the this latest release candidate and I'm +1 on the release, 
>> but
>with one needed change on the binary release NOTICE.
>>
>> AFAIK it is allowed to do (only) such minor textual update of a release
>candidate with are are only informational, e.g. on release notes or N&L 
>file(s),
>without having to go through a full new release cycle.
>>
>> So, under the condition the below proposed change is made, before starting
>a vote on IPMC, I'm going to vote +1 on this candidate. I also don't see the
>need to do this change now already, during the current PPMC vote.
>>
>> The one missing bit I found concerns required NOTICE on bundling Derby,
>which is embedded within the wookie.war. The below section I copied from
>the NOTICE inside derby-10.4.2.0.jar:
>>
>>   This product includes software developed by
>>   The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>
>>   Portions of Derby were originally developed by
>>   International Business Machines Corporation and are
>>   licensed to the Apache Software Foundation under the
>>   "Software Grant and Corporate Contribution License Agreement",
>>   informally known as the "Derby CLA".
>>   The following copyright notice(s) were affixed to portions of the code
>>   with which this file is now or was at one time distributed
>>   and are placed here unaltered.
>>
>>   (C) Copyright 1997,2004 International Business Machines Corporation.  All
>rights reserved.
>>
>>   (C) Copyright IBM Corp. 2003.
>>
>>   The portion of the functionTests under 'nist' was originally
>>   developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
>>   an agency of the United States Department of Commerce, and adapted by
>>   International Business Machines Corporation in accordance with the NIST
>>   Software Acknowledgment and Redistribution document at
>>   http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/ctg/sql_form.htm
>>
>> Another minor issue is that the CHANGELOG somehow misses a reference
>to RAVE-484: Deploy Wookie WAR along with Rave Portal. But that is no show
>stopper.
>>
>> Thanks, Ate
>>
>>
>> On 03/03/2012 10:17 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>> I've created a 0.9-incubating release candidate, with the following
>>> artifacts up for a vote:
>>>
>>> SVN source tag (r1296695):
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.9-incubating/
>>>
>>> Maven staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-049/
>>>
>>>
>>> Source release:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-
>049/org/ap
>>> ache/rave/rave-project/0.9-incubating/rave-project-0.9-incubating-
>source-re
>>> lease.zip
>>>
>>> Demo Artifacts
>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.9-incubating/apache-
>rave-0
>>> .9-incubating-bin.tar.gz
>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.9-incubating/apache-
>rave-0
>>> .9-incubating-bin.zip
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPVlveAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDivwIAJqBAUiF436A1bvJt0QB1iNq
>dBrsmL51Udm1mYsjWjzZtxVJOCxrwQlxljZiSpkWB1HHAR6xKVVZuvysxD3TYuIT
>QzsEa2ip5Kli/B/t0v09KXtuK9DrA9kx4ZnrEwVKJYrlM4x+PeX3aXzBZSq8IujV
>ugF5Vip2v+rJmiRK2RuBNkkhjLKrWsSTBDup+/cCuX15AaLCPs4G0DJOoM3T17xj
>1ezyZzneLSgb7zuprfwgMyuVx44ec6qqHhtSSS1COCQvv6XZ0UhWpVBU+dhmX
>dNq
>8n800LG9IUesyDrDS+inxzk6xGPnmRK4iwfa1YMKViUJw/q0HbWaKJTON3VF7C
>w=
>=xKAj
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to