I assume this change would take place shortly after Shindig does a 2.5
(since they renamed 3.0 to 2.5) beta release. Is there any idea of when
that might be coming?

Thanks,
Chris

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Mahadevan, Venkat <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Ate
>
> SHINDIG-1691 looks like what we are looking for :-) is there a plan to
> update rave-sindig to include these changes?
>
>
> Thanks
> Venkat
>
>
>
>
> On 3/8/12 11:32 AM, "Ate Douma" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On 03/08/2012 05:23 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Mahadevan, Venkat [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:58 AM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: [PROPOSAL] - Rave-Shindig Reorganization
> >>>
> >>> Hi All
> >>>
> >>> We are working on a project internally that uses the Rave code base.
> >>> Currently we overlay rave-shindig and override the
> >>>rave.shindig.properties
> >>> file. Going forward we would like to implement the interfaces in
> >>>rave-shindig
> >>> for some of the features like  findFriends, findAllConnectedPeople
> >>>etc. The
> >>> current overlay structure is hindering us from implementing these
> >>>features.
> >>> So I would to put forward this proposal for refactoring the current
> >>>rave-
> >>> shindig and rave-providers structures which would allow anyone to
> >>> implement the shindig changes.
> >>>
> >>> The new structure would look like this:
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>> rave-portal-dependencies
> >>> ...
> >>> rave-providers
> >>> rave-opensocial-provider
> >>> rave-opensocial-core
> >>> rave-opensocial-client
> >>> rave-opensocial-server
> >>> rave-shindig-resources
> >>> rave-shindig-dependencies
> >>> rave-shindig
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts, suggestions?
> >>
> >> Are these all at the same level?  If not, can you show how the
> >>structure would be?
> >>
> >> IE)  |_directory
> >>               |_ subdirectory
> >>
> >
> >Did you take into account the incoming changes of SHINDIG-1691 for the
> >next
> >shindig 2.5.0 release? Those should make customizing and extending
> >Shindig much
> >easier.
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Venkat
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to