Tested with batch_window_settings patch...
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Anders Kvist wrote:
> > - When no files is added to queue I see completelly empty tab - it
> > looks strange. In the first moment I started thinking that something
> > is wrong. Suggestion: if no files in queue -> write small center
> > text "no files in queue".
> I don't really know about this...i don't think the treeview can do this,
> which means it would be a rather difficult thing to make...
Looks good. IMO "settings" should be expanded by default and no additional
info about empty queue isn't needed (but would be nice :) ).
> > - all the setting in "Export As.." menu should be accessible in
> > "Batch" tab. Now I have to save one file manually and after that
> > all of my files from queue are processed like I want.
> Try the patch i posted just before i went to bed.
> http://rawstudio.org/files/patches/akv/rev1068_batch_window_settings.patch
Looks great :) I was thinking exactly about that :)
Missing things:
- quallity settings
- size settings
> > - After openning directory I can select one particular file. I should
> > have few things of status (like in rawshooter): what priority for
> > that file is set? Was that file adjusted? Was it exported? Maybe
> > even "how many times". It will be really helpfull.
> This was up on the list a few days ago, we have been talking about
> making some layover icons to show those info on the thumbnails.
I missed that - too much work to read everything with care :)
> > - "Add to queue" button - really needed (like in rawshooter).
> Why does a button that a shortcut doesn't??
1. You have to remember about shortcut. I have always problem with that
and only really often used things I can remember...
2. When you're starting with program small "+" icon is really useful and
doesn't force you to dig all the menus.
> > - "Run!" should be in "Batch" tab.
> Also up a few days ago, there will be buttons for run/pause and remove
> and maybe move up/down. Should they be under or over the treeview?
rawshooter has it under, but over is also ok.
IMvHO it doesn't matter :)
> > I see a bug in exif processing. I'm clicking on picture and under
> > "Histogram" I'm getting exif information, usually: focal length,
> > exposure time, aperture and ISO. But sometimes (especially when I'm
> > quickly changing the pictures) some of these informations are missing
> > (mostly focal lenght), exif information is not centered or focal
> > lenght is bogus (i.e.: 17200mm or -2350mm).
> I've seen this too, but never were able to debug it or replicate it...
well... it look like some race-conditions between: select image, read exif
and reading the image.
I know - that conclusion won't help much ;)
> > Few more things:
> > - after image adjusting the thumbnail should recreated to show current
> > state of the image.
> I've thought about this, but which setting should be used A, B og C?
Last used with that image.
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.
_______________________________________________
Rawstudio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
