> Well it figures that someone has already done it :-S I checked the mailing > list, but I think I must have joined just after those e-mails went around, > and nobody claimed the exif bug report on bugzilla (which I accepted in the > meanwhile). > > Where do you stand with this, Rafael? Do you have a completed patch? I'm > not seeing anything, at least in trunk.
Not a completed one. Your patch looks more complete in handling which parts of EXIF should be copied. One thing that I had was support for getting the UI info from the EXIF. I got completely lost debugging other issues. > Regarding the UI, I didn't make any changes there. This is something that > probably should be done, but I didn't want to make any decisions regarding > the UI. Am I understanding you right, in that you are suggesting that there > should be some sort of properties page on the UI so that people can see info > like aperture and focal length and verify that the jpg was written > correctly? The UI already has some metadata parsing for displaying thing like the ISO. This should come from the same code that copies the info from raw to jpeg. > Thanks again, > Daniel Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
