Jordan suggested using -lm 4 on my razor-check, and
it has boosted razor accuracy by maybe 20%. The 77% for 9-15 is the
highest Razor score I have seen yet. For an individual instead of a
corporation, I think Razor would be much higher than 75%. Our corporation
gets a lot of targeted spam trying to sell us certain raw materials we use for
manufacturing, and things like that. Those kind of spams don't have enough
critical mass to be easily Razored.
Fox
| |||||||
Date | Spam Count | Jammed | Razored | Blacklisted | Trollbox | Bayesian | Bayesian 2 |
2002-09-10 | 285 | 185 (64.91%) | 128 (44.91%) | 23 ( 8.07%) | 118 (41.40%) | 240 (84.21%) | 229 (80.35%) |
2002-09-11 | 243 | 121 (49.79%) | 123 (50.62%) | 19 ( 7.82%) | 79 (32.51%) | 227 (93.42%) | 136 (55.97%) |
2002-09-12 | 302 | 95 (31.46%) | 139 (46.03%) | 25 ( 8.28%) | 89 (29.47%) | 273 (90.40%) | 0 ( 0.00%) |
2002-09-13 | 392 | 126 (32.14%) | 231 (58.93%) | 47 (11.99%) | 148 (37.76%) | 363 (92.60%) | 0 ( 0.00%) |
2002-09-14 | 334 | 147 (44.01%) | 203 (60.78%) | 7 ( 2.10%) | 116 (34.73%) | 322 (96.41%) | 0 ( 0.00%) |
2002-09-15 | 237 | 104 (43.88%) | 183 (77.22%) | 5 ( 2.11%) | 79 (33.33%) | 230 (97.05%) | 0 ( 0.00%) |
2002-09-16 | 325 | 84 (25.85%) | 213 (65.54%) | 6 ( 1.85%) | 97 (29.85%) | 279 (85.85%) | 0 ( 0.00%) |
2002-09-17 | 121 | 20 (16.53%) | 85 (70.25%) | 4 ( 3.31%) | 50 (41.32%) | 110 (90.91%) | 0 ( 0.00%) |