"Fox" said:
> Before or after I whitelisted all the legit mailing lists that Razor is > tagging? I had one false positive in the last four days. Razor tagged some > guys person-to-person message because he used an ostrich-in-your-face jpeg > that is probably pretty popular on the net, and -lm 4 means any single > attachment in a message that is razored, razors the whole message, if I > understand it correctly. Razor folks: is -lm documented anywhere? BTW, I notice all my *.conf files in ~/.razor use "lm = 4" by default anyway. > No, I am not keeping official tally of false positives. I need to write a > html interface to do it, and then it would be easy. I imagine you want > false positive rate per filter. I will work on it tomorrow, and maybe in a > week I will have some stats for false positives. Yeah, that'd be cool -- much appreciated! comparing text classifiers like spam filters, without tracking FPs, is not good. After all, "cat > /dev/null" gets a 100% hit rate, but without the FP rate figure of, let's say 90%, you'd never know it was a bad thing to do ;) --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
