I am going to look into this today... cheers, vipul.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 01:01:30PM -0500, Spam wrote: > Until I hear from the Razor developers that they are going to fix this soon, > I guess I will try and write a preprocessor that modifies messages and > eliminates the empty MIME parts before I feed them to razor. Something > like: > > cat message-to-check | nuke_blank_mime_parts | razor-check > > Fox > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Russell J. Lahti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:52 PM > Subject: RE: [Razor-users] Strange false positive from Razor2 > > > > > > There we go! Thank you for answering *my* question. > > > > I was worried that my system was reporting all mail as > > SPAM, because inner-office mail was being marked as > > listed in razor2 by SpamAssassin. After capturing one > > of these messages and running razor-check -d on it, those > > exact MIME parts in them, and report back positive. > > > > I've been forced to severely downgrade the points that > > the razor2 check adds to spamassasin because I have many > > people complaining about such false positives. > > > > Hopefully someone can resolve this so I can actually use > > razor2 in a productive way. > > > > -Russell > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > More than likely, you use Outlook or Outlook Express, and it added the > > > little empty MIME part that Razor thinks is spam. Check her message > and see > > > if something like the following is in it. I still haven't heard how > the > > > Razor developers are going to fix this problem, but it would be > encouraging > > > to know they haven't forgotten about it. About 30% of my corporation's > > > false positives (after I whitelisted all our mailing lists) are from > this > > > one problem. > > > > > > Fox > > > > > > --------------cut here --------------------------------- > > > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > > > -----------------cut here ------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en > > _______________________________________________ > > Razor-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en > _______________________________________________ > Razor-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users -- Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not Software Design Artist | widely distributed yet." http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
