Is anybody out there?  Does Vipul still monitor this list?

I need some help solving this problem.

Please, somebody reply.

Thanks,

Gordon



On 06/13/2011 09:05 AM, Gordon Dickens wrote:
OK. I have done some more testing and I have determined that for some reason the e4 engine is not working properly.   Razor is working fine with the e8 engine when the email has an html link.  However, for email that does not have an html link, the e4 engine does not appear to be working at all.  For example, if I send an email with an html link then the razor-agent.log includes the following:

Jun 13 08:58:28.390641 check[30765]: [ 3] mail 1 is not known spam.

However, if I send an email without an html link then the razor-agent log includes the following:

Jun 13 08:57:40.473247 check[30765]: [ 5] mail 1.0 e8 got no sig
Jun 13 08:57:40.473287 check[30765]: [ 5] No queries, no spam

So, does anybody have any idea with the e4 engine is not working?

Thanks,

Gordon



On 06/13/2011 08:09 AM, Tor Willy Austerslått wrote:
On 13. juni 2011, at 12.51, Gordon Dickens wrote:

Hi Willy,

Thanks for your prompt reply and suggestion!  I had not run a discovery in a while so I ran it as follows:

razor-admin -home=/etc/mail/spamassassin/.razor -discover


However, that didn't fix it.  The GTUBE string still was not identified. It appears that e4 is not running at all.  From my razor log:

I'm not convinced Razor would trigger on a GTUBE string, however useful that would be. If GTUBE is a special case in the razor agent, please let me know. However, I have a couple of old spams saved to test things like this. One has a URL somewhere in it for e8 testing, the other one doesn't (for e4 testing):

razor-check -d <spammail.txt

When I test now it appears only engine 8 (e8) responds, but it doesn't care about mails without URLs. Thus no signature is created or checked for e8:
Jun 13 13:57:18.821359 check[58527]: [ 6] Engine (8) didn't produce a signature for mail 1.0

There is nothing whatsoever about engine 4 (e4) in the debug output, except that the log claims the client supports it. Otherwise it's silent. Odd that Pyzor is working though.

Razor 2.84 appears to work halfway. Nothing in my spamfolders are older than 14 days, so I can't go back to see when e4 signatures last worked. The last message in razor-users before this thread shows e4 did respond, so I'm not sure what's up.

In short: I have no clue.

-- 
Tor Willy Austerslått
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users

Reply via email to