You could try packing the keys before reloading.

Regards,
Alastair.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ramsour Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:19 PM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - RELOAD slower on 6.5++ In-line patch 3?


> Fellowship of the R>
>
> I have experienced a considerable slowdown in the speed of the RELOAD
> command of late.  I am running R:Base 6.5++ for Windows on a Windows 2000
> system with a 2 gHz processor and 1 GB of RAM.  I have 20+ GB of available
> disk space and the combined size of my database hovers around 1.2 GB.
When
> I first got my new system a couple of  months ago reloads took about 10
> minutes, now its taking half an hour or more.  Nothing else is running on
my
> system and the only thing that's really different is that I have crossed
the
> 1 GB line in the size of my RB2 file.
>
> If I do an UNLOAD ALL and then RUN the UNLOADEDed files the whole process
of
> recreating the database, reloading the data and recreating the indexes
takes
> about 10 minutes.  It's just the RELOAD command that's taking a lot longer
> now.  I thought at first that maybe having a couple of active ODBC
> connections to some MS-SQL databases may have been the culprit but I have
> SDETACHed and SDISCONNECTed the tables and connections but RELOAD is still
> slow.
>
> Is there something else I should be looking at?  I haven't loaded any new
> software or changed anything else in my system -- at least not that I can
> think of.  I'm stumped.
>
> I have a (possibly) related issue in that my morning routine which
consists
> of running nearly 100 command files has slowed down from about 50 minutes
of
> run time to about 2 hours.  I have redesigned the way my programs are run
by
> doing the QUIT TO technique that Razzak recommends but things are still
> running slower than at first.  I just can't figure out what's going on.
>
> "Help me Obiwan Kenobi.  You're my only hope!"
>
> Thanks for any and all input.
>
> Mike Ramsour
> Voice:  740-829-4340
>

Reply via email to