well, pardon me if im wrong because i havent worked much with views and
never worked with rules, but it looks to me that the rule is whats letting >
10 through.

the rule basicly says in english:

let in records where InstCount <= 10
OR
let in records that are not part of the view

it seems to me the rule should be:

let in records where IsntCount<=10
OR
(let in records that are not part of the view and these records have
InstCount<=10)

so i think that would look something like this:

(Top10_Performances.Inst_Type IN ( SELECT InstType FROM
Top10_Rule_View WHERE InstCount <= 10 ) OR (NOT
Top10_Performances.Inst_Type IN ( SELECT InstType FROM
Top10_Rule_View ) AND Top10_Performances.InstCount<=10))



----- Original Message -----
From: "Alastair Burr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:19 AM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Rule problem


> I think I've found out what's wrong while playing with the view as Sami
> suggested:
>
> While a value exists in the view then it works.
> When a value doesn't exist then it also works - but not as I want - or
> expected.
>
> Obviously, once the penny/cent drops, any new value will not be in the
> view so the rule prevents the addition of the row.
>
> So I changed the view to:
>
> create view Top10_Rule_View (InstType, InstCount) as SELECT
> Inst_Type, COUNT(Inst_Type) FROM Top10_Performances
> GROUP BY Inst_Type
>
> and the rule to:
>
> (Top10_Performances.Inst_Type IN ( SELECT InstType FROM
> Top10_Rule_View WHERE InstCount <= 10 ) OR NOT
> Top10_Performances.Inst_Type IN ( SELECT InstType FROM
> Top10_Rule_View ))
>
> I had hoped that this would prevent entries where the count was more
> than 10 and let in any new Inst_Type(s).
> It lets in new ones but also more than 10 the same.
>
> Anybody got any ideas why?
>
> Regards,
> Alastair.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alastair Burr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 5:48 PM
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Rule problem
>
>
> > Thanks, Sami,
> >
> > I was trying to avoid a view because _as far as I can tell_ the select
> works
> > at the R:>.
> >
> > I'll give it a while and see if anybody else has any comments then try a
> > view.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alastair.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sami Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 4:41 PM
> > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Rule problem
> >
> >
> > > Alastair -
> > >
> > > It seems like this should work but ...Have you tried creating the
GROUP
> BY
> > > portion as a view and referencing the view in your rule?
> > >
> > > Sami
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > > Sami Aaron
> > > Software Management Specialists
> > > 19312 W 63rd Terr
> > > Shawnee KS  66218
> > > 913-915-1971
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.softwaremgmt.com
> > >
> > >  ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Alastair Burr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 6:14 AM
> > > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Rule problem
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Can anybody tell me why this rule doesn't work?
> > > >
> > > > MESSAGE :  Limit of [ 10 ] entries reached!
> > > > TABLE :  Top10_Performances    Row is added or changed if condition
> > > SUCCEEDS
> > > > WHERE :  Top10_Performances.Inst_Type IN ( SELECT Inst_Type FROM
> > > >  Top10_Performances GROUP BY Inst_Type HAVING COUNT(Inst_Type) <=
10 )
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to limit the number of rows for any individual value in
> > > Inst_Type
> > > > to a maximum of 10 (10 guitars, 10 drums, etc.). At the moment
> whichever
> > I
> > > > way I try this (succeeds or fails) I cannot change anything even
> though
> > > > there are only 5 rows in the table.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Alastair.
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------
> > > > A D B Burr,
> > > > St. Albans, UK.
> > > > ----------------------------------
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > ----------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to