Interesting
I will give it a ago. Previous I have always avoided this solutotion
since I was sure how indexes where habled. My I will trie
Thanks Larry
Gunnar Ekblad

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lawrence
Lustig
Sent: den 26 februari 2003 20:14
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Ping - Ignore

> I must confess this is the best idea I stole from A. I do not dare to
> name the full name of A afraid of being on the black list
> To my defence I have 1 A database and maybe 600 for R
> So my conclusion is even the enemy have some bright ideas now and then

Gunnar:

You should be able to use "R" in pretty much the same way as you use "A"
--
you can put all your forms and reports in one database and SCONNECT
another
database with the data tables in it.  You can simply update the front
end
database.

In addition, "A" has an extremely annoying quality when linking tables
in
two databases -- the linked database path is stored in the linkage.
This
means trouble if you want to move the linked database or if the
development
machine and the deployment machine have different directory structures.
Since "R" will SCONNECT via an ODBC DSN, you have a level of abstraction
so
that the databases can be placed in different directories on different
machines.
--
Larry

Reply via email to