[RBASE-L] - Re: DOS 6.0 Duh Question - Razzak's Reply

[DKauf22024]

In a message dated 3/8/2003 8:18:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I'll be looking into it, but I gotta say I'm a little gun-shy. I
invested in the first and second Windows versions and found them so
unsatisfactory as to vow to invest no more. What's the concensus out there?
Is the 6.5++ Windows version user-friendly enough for the non-developer
plumber/salesman to convert his 3.1 application without countless hours of
dead ends and profanity? (because if I'm going to do it, might as well go
all the way to Windows)

Jack,

Well, I was an ALL DOS shop, but we've made the jump to 6.5++ DOS, Converting a bunch of stuff to 6.5++ Win, which is GREAT after you figure out the little tricks, and 7.0 Win is fantastic!!! If you're using DOS, I'd suggest 6.5++ for DOS, then make the jump to Windows, then to 7.0 Windows. And I'm just a poor old dumb springmaker, so I KNOW a plumber can do it. We probably use the same cuss words <g>

Just my $.02 worth

Damon
Damon D. Kaufman
President
Stalder Spring Works, Inc
ISO-9002 / QS-9000 Certified
2345 S. Yellow Springs St.
Springfield, Ohio 45506
Voice 937,322,6120
Fax 937,322,2126
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]